The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that Sarah Ransome ...
Summary
The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein do not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA because their alleged victimization occurred after the conduct underlying the offenses charged against Maxwell ended in 2004. The letter requests that the court clarify who will be permitted to speak at the sentencing proceeding.
Persons Referenced (5)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 667
The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein do not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA because their alleged victimization occurred after the conduct underlying the offenses charged against Maxwell ended in 2004. The letter requests that the court clarify who will be permitted to speak at the sentencing proceeding.
Letter to the Court: doj-ogr-00010725
This letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, opposes the motion by Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein to give oral victim impact statements during Maxwell's sentencing, arguing they are not statutory crime victims under the CVRA.
The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, responding to a co...
The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, responding to a court order regarding the application by two victims, Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, to speak at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. The government defers to the court's previous order on the matter, which allowed non-direct victims to submit written statements but not speak at the hearing.
Court Filing: 678
The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, responding to a court order regarding the application by two victims, Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, to speak at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. The government defers to the court's previous order on the matter, which allowed non-direct victims to submit written statements but not speak at the hearing.
Court Order: 686
The court has received victim impact statements from several individuals and has decided to allow some of them to make oral statements at sentencing, while others will be heard in writing only. The court has also denied the defendant's redaction requests.
The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that the MDC's objection to the court's order allo...
The letter, written by Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that the MDC's objection to the court's order allowing Ghislaine Maxwell to use a laptop computer on weekends and holidays is unfounded. It asserts that Ms. Maxwell needs access to the laptop to review the millions of pages of discovery materials produced by the government, and that the MDC's proposed solution of using the prison computer is inadequate due to its technical limitations.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.