Skip to content
Case File
d-18687House OversightOther

Legal brief argues Fifth Amendment privilege blocks House subpoena for Flynn's meetings with Russian officials

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #031674
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The passage is a legal argument citing case law to oppose a congressional subpoena of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn. It does not provide new factual leads, names of meetings, dates, o Cites United States v. Doe, Hubbell, Fisher, and other precedents to argue the subpoena is overly br Claims the subpoena would compel Flynn to create a new document listing meetings with Russian offi

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (3)

Tags

michael-flynnfifth-amendmentsubpoenalegal-precedentlegal-exposurehouse-oversightcongressional-oversight
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Legal Analysis of Testimonial Privilege in Subpoenaed Document Production

The passage provides a doctrinal summary of Supreme Court cases (Fisher, Hubbell, Ponds) concerning the Fifth Amendment testimonial privilege. It contains no specific allegations, names, transactions, Distinguishes between 'foregone conclusion' and testimonial document production. Cites Fisher v. United States (1976) and United States v. Hubbell (2000) as precedents. Explains the burden on the gov

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

General Flynn Cites Fifth Amendment Privilege to Decline Congressional Document Production

The passage merely outlines legal arguments for Flynn's Fifth Amendment claim and references existing case law. It does not provide new factual leads, names, transactions, or evidence of misconduct, o Flynn argues that producing documents would be testimonial and thus protected. References to Watkins v. United States and United States v. Hubbell establish legal precedent. Mentions that the DOJ has

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

House Oversight Committee Subpoena to General Flynn Lacks Specificity, Raising Fifth Amendment Concerns

The passage outlines a legal argument that the Committee's subpoena to former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is overly broad and may violate his Fifth Amendment rights. It provides specific d The subpoena demands a comprehensive list of all meetings and communications between Flynn and any R It also seeks all communications related to Russia involving Trump campaign members and advisors w

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Federal prosecutors subpoena Trump inaugural committee documents – possible Flynn/Middle East link hinted

The snippet references a Washington Post story about a sweeping subpoena to the Trump inaugural committee, suggesting a criminal probe that could involve former national security adviser Michael Flynn WaPo article reports a federal subpoena for Trump inaugural committee documents (Feb 2019). Sender claims they never attended a meeting with Flynn and any Middle‑East individuals during the tr Anothe

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alleged Mueller Plan to Indict President Trump for Obstruction and Counter‑Pardon Strategy

The passage claims the Special Counsel has a ready indictment and a legal strategy to block a potential pardon of Michael Flynn, suggesting internal deliberations and a required sign‑off by Deputy Att Mueller’s team allegedly drafted obstruction‑of‑justice charges against President Trump. A legal theory is said to exist to oppose a possible presidential pardon of Michael Flynn. The indictment woul

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Former DOJ attorney argues against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, citing prior victim‑rights work

The passage provides a potential lead that a senior DOJ official with a background in child‑victim prosecution advocated against charging Epstein, suggesting internal influence on the case. It names a Author claims to have co‑authored the DOJ Federal Child Support Prosecution Handbook. Author participated in high‑profile child‑exploitation prosecutions (e.g., United States v. Dwight Y Author argue

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.