The defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell requests a two-week extension to file pretrial motions and mo...
Summary
The defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell requests a two-week extension to file pretrial motions and modify the briefing schedule due to COVID-19 restrictions and the large volume of discovery. The government consents to the requested extension. The proposed new deadlines are January 25, 2021, for the defendant's motions, February 26, 2021, for the government's response, and March 5, 2021, for the defendant's reply.
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-tr...
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.
The government responds to a court order regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's access to a laptop for review...
The government responds to a court order regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's access to a laptop for reviewing discovery on weekends and holidays, deferring to the MDC's judgment while noting the defendant's extensive access to discovery materials. The government has provided a laptop and reformatted discovery materials to facilitate her review. Maxwell has been allowed 13 hours a day, 7 days a week access to review discovery.
The court order addresses Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-trial motions, adopting her proposed redactions an...
The court order addresses Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-trial motions, adopting her proposed redactions and some additional ones suggested by the government to protect sensitive information and third-party privacy. The court applies the Lugosch test to justify the redactions, and orders the defendant to file the redacted documents by February 5, 2021.
The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discuss...
The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discussing the proposed redactions to court documents in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The parties have reached an agreement on redactions to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter. The Government is submitting its omnibus memorandum of law with proposed redactions under seal for the Court's consideration.
The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the...
The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case, discussing the government's concerns and requests related to the defendant's use of Rule 17(c) subpoenas. The government argues that Rule 17(c) is not a discovery device and requests the court to direct the defendant to provide notice of subpoenas and to mark productions as confidential. The letter provides an overview of the legal standards governing Rule 17(c) subpoenas.
The document argues that the government's case against Ghislaine Maxwell is weakening as her detenti...
The document argues that the government's case against Ghislaine Maxwell is weakening as her detention period extends, and that the government's assessment of her flight risk has increased in tandem with the diminishing strength of their case. It highlights the defendant's challenges to the indictment, including the Non-Prosecution Agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and statute of limitations issues. The document also alleges that government prosecutors misled a federal judge to obtain evidence against Maxwell.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.