Skip to content
Case File
d-1910House OversightLegal Filing

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for th...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1910
Pages
1
Persons
5

Summary

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for the authentication and admissibility of Government Exhibit 52, a contact book belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell, based on the testimony of Juan Alessi, a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell. The letter discusses the applicable law and provides details on Alessi's testimony, which identifies the contact book and corroborates its relevance to the case.

Tags

Authentication of EvidenceGovernment Exhibit 52 (Contact Book)Admissibility of Evidence
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 700

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for the authentication and admissibility of Government Exhibit 52, a contact book belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell, based on the testimony of Juan Alessi, a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell. The letter discusses the applicable law and provides details on Alessi's testimony, which identifies the contact book and corroborates its relevance to the case.

6p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 457

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing that Government Exhibit 52, a contact book belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell, is authentic and should be admitted as evidence in her trial. The Government contends that Employee-1's testimony will establish the book's authenticity and relevance to the case.

8p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 491

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that Government Exhibit 52, an address book, is authentic and should not be excluded from evidence. The government contends that Employee-1 can authenticate the exhibit despite not being present when it was removed from Jeffrey Epstein's property. The letter cites case law and provides analogies to support the government's position.

4p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Government Exhibit 52, an address bo...

The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Government Exhibit 52, an address book allegedly belonging to Jeffrey Epstein, is not authentic and should not be admitted as evidence without proper authentication. The defense contends that the book was altered by Alfredo Rodriguez, a former Epstein employee, and that the government's witness cannot verify its authenticity.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan, responding to a letter from the Bureau of...

The document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan, responding to a letter from the Bureau of Prisons requesting that the court vacate its previous order allowing Ghislaine Maxwell access to her government-provided laptop on weekends and holidays. The Bureau of Prisons argues that Maxwell has sufficient time to review discovery materials during the week and that the previous order should be vacated.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The letter, filed on March 15, 2021, informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that the defense team for Ghisla...

The letter, filed on March 15, 2021, informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell will be filing multiple reply memoranda in support of various motions. The letter discusses the procedure for filing these documents, including redactions and sealing due to confidential information. The defense team will submit the documents to the court and government via email, awaiting further instruction on public filing.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.