Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-19138House OversightFlight Log

Logistics email discussing temporary flight restriction for President Trump's Friday travel to PBI

The passage merely coordinates flight timing and airport options to comply with a known temporary flight restriction for President Trump. It provides no new factual allegations, financial transactions Email from Larry Visoski to a colleague about Trump’s arrival at Palm Beach International (PBI) on a Mentions a Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) effective at 6 pm that must be observed. Discusses u

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #033229
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage merely coordinates flight timing and airport options to comply with a known temporary flight restriction for President Trump. It provides no new factual allegations, financial transactions Email from Larry Visoski to a colleague about Trump’s arrival at Palm Beach International (PBI) on a Mentions a Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) effective at 6 pm that must be observed. Discusses u

Tags

logistical-coordinationtravel-logisticspresident-trumphouse-oversightaviationtemporary-flight-restriction

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Larry Visoski Sent: 3/16/2017 8:35:54 AM To: Je vacation [[email protected]] CC: Lesley Groff Subject: Trump TFR Friday RBI Jeffrey Pres. Trump arrives PBI Friday at 6pm is TFR is effective,. If we land before 6pm we are ok. Newark is not a gateway airport to PBI, only Teterboro„ If you want to arrive in PBI after 6pm,. I can relocate the GIV to Teterboro, What time do you estimate wheels up Friday from Newark? Or should I move plane to Teterboro Friday afternoon? Thx Larry Sent from my iPhone

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightJan 17, 2014

Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures

Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

1p
House OversightNov 4, 2011

Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse

Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse The passage merely references a prior deposition where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, offering no new names, transactions, or actionable details beyond what is already public. It confirms existing allegations but provides no novel leads for investigation. Key insights: Cites Epstein's deposition on March 17, 2010; Notes Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual preferences; Mentions adverse inference doctrine in civil procedure

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Coordination of Trump’s Flight to Palm Beach Amid Temporary Flight Restriction

The email shows a private individual arranging flight logistics for President Trump to avoid a Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) at Palm Beach International Airport. It hints at possible preferential President Trump scheduled to arrive at PBI on a Friday evening. A Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) was in effect at PBI after 6 pm. The sender suggests moving the flight to Teterboro to bypass the

1p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein Child Sex Trafficking Investigation – FBI Records, Deleted Pages, Non‑Prosecution Deal, High‑Profile Connections

The compiled documents reveal a dense web of FBI case files, internal forms, and communications that reference Jeffrey Epstein’s illegal sexual activities with minors, a secret non‑prosecution agreeme FBI case number 31E‑MM‑108062 repeatedly references ‘Child Locate’ entries and deleted pages (b6, b7 Multiple internal FD‑515 forms list Jeffrey Epstein as a subject (named explicitly on 09/30/2008 e

181p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Extensive court filing outlines alleged Jeffrey Epstein abuse network, non‑prosecution deal, and potential ties to high‑profile figures (Clinton, T...

The document provides a dense compilation of alleged facts, emails, deposition excerpts, and discovery requests that link Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual‑abuse operation to a “pyramid” recruitment scheme, a Epstein allegedly ran a “pyramid” scheme paying underage victims $200‑$300 per recruited girl. A 2007 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office allegedly shielded Epstein fr Ema

39p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.