Attorney recounts Deep Throat obscenity case and defense strategy
Summary
The passage provides anecdotal details about a historic obscenity prosecution and the author's personal stance, but offers no concrete new leads, financial flows, or involvement of high‑ranking offici Author claims to have avoided watching Deep Throat to argue for adult choice in obscenity cases. Describes prosecution of actor Harry Reems for conspiracy to transport obscene material. Notes prosecu
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Attorney recounts involvement in Pentagon Papers litigation and Supreme Court arguments
The passage provides a personal recollection of historic legal work related to the Pentagon Papers, mentioning well‑known figures (Senator Mike Gravel, Justice Potter Stewart, Alexander Bickel, Solici The author represented Beacon Press and Senator Gravel in Pentagon Papers cases that reached the Sup Mentions a hypothetical discussion between Justice Stewart and constitutional scholar Alexander Bi
Self‑authored account of alleged criminal defamation case in Italy over criticism of a federal judge
The passage is a personal narrative describing a defamation claim filed by an Italian prosecutor against the author for comments about a judge. It contains no concrete evidence, financial transactions Author claims to have been criminally charged in Turin for statements made from Cambridge. Charges allegedly stem from criticism of a federal judge’s opinion on terrorism suspects. No specific names,
Subject dismisses O'Brien's allegations and defends past Army PSYOP work
The passage offers vague denials and general statements without specific names, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It mentions a book with broad accusations but provides no concrete leads to Author claims O'Brien's book contains unverified sex accusations against many officials. No libel suits filed, implying the author considers the claims fringe. Denial of involvement in MK‑Ultra, stat
Alleged Israeli Military Intelligence Knowledge of Phalangist Involvement in Sabra and Shatila Massacre
The passage provides a first‑person recollection that Israeli intelligence officers were aware that Phalangist militia had entered the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps and that attempts were made to ha Claims that Israeli military intelligence heard rumors of Phalangist entry into the camps. Attempts by the author to contact senior officers (Arik, Oded Shamir) to halt the operation. Reference to se
Attorney recounts 1960s First Amendment challenge to US Customs ban of Swedish film "I Am Curious Yellow"
The passage is a personal recollection of a historic First Amendment litigation concerning an obscenity case. It mentions no current actors, financial flows, or wrongdoing by powerful officials. While The film was seized by US Customs and banned nationwide in the late 1960s. Grove Press owned the film and hired the author to litigate. The author attempted to challenge Massachusetts obscenity statu
Former DePaul faculty member alleges involvement in tenure review of controversial professor
The passage details personal grievances and academic disputes with no concrete evidence of wrongdoing by high‑level officials, financial transactions, or foreign influence. It lacks actionable leads, Author claims to have been asked by a former department chair to expose alleged dishonesty. Accusations of harassment and extremist language directed at the author. Reference to a cartoon controversy
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.