Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-1924House OversightLegal Filing

The government moves to preclude testimony from certain defense witnesses, including Eva Dubin, Mich...

The government moves to preclude testimony from certain defense witnesses, including Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly Bovino, regarding their alleged participation in sexualized massages with Jane, arguing that it is irrelevant and improper impeachment. The government also seeks to preclude testimony from other witnesses, including Alexander Hamilton and Dr. Loftus, on various grounds.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1924
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The government moves to preclude testimony from certain defense witnesses, including Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly Bovino, regarding their alleged participation in sexualized massages with Jane, arguing that it is irrelevant and improper impeachment. The government also seeks to preclude testimony from other witnesses, including Alexander Hamilton and Dr. Loftus, on various grounds.

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

Motion to preclude certain testimony of defense witnessesRelevance and admissibility of evidence under Federal Rules of Evidence 402 and 403Impeachment by contradiction under Federal Rule of Evidence 608(b)
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 706

The government moves to preclude testimony from certain defense witnesses, including Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly Bovino, regarding their alleged participation in sexualized massages with Jane, arguing that it is irrelevant and improper impeachment. The government also seeks to preclude testimony from other witnesses, including Alexander Hamilton and Dr. Loftus, on various grounds.

12p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 723

The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that the testimony of Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly Bovino is relevant, material, and exculpatory, contradicting Jane's testimony about group sexualized massages involving Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The defense asserts that excluding this testimony would violate Maxwell's right to present a defense and confront her accusers.

13p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that the testimony of Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, a...

The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that the testimony of Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly Bovino is relevant, material, and exculpatory, contradicting Jane's testimony about group sexualized massages involving Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The defense asserts that excluding this testimony would violate Maxwell's right to present a defense and confront her accusers.

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02670479

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02675072

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01819053

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.