Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-19301House OversightOther

Essay on Western Decline and China’s Rise Lacks Concrete Leads

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #030055
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a philosophical commentary on imperialism, Western decline, and China’s rise. It contains no specific names, dates, transactions, or actionable allegations involving powerful actors, ma Discusses historical perspectives on imperialism and the West’s decline. Mentions China’s economic growth and its impact on global dynamics. References scholars like Edward Gibbon, Marx, and Ferguson

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

historical-analysisgeopoliticschinawestern-declinehouse-oversight
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
26 But that is the weakest line of attack. Edward Gibbon once described history as being little better than a record of the “crimes, follies and misfortunes of mankind.” Imperialism certainly added its quota to these. But the question is whether it also provided, through Hegel’s “cunning of reason,” the means to escape from them. Even Marx justified British rule in India on these grounds. Ferguson, too, can make a sound argument for such a proposition. The most serious weakness in Ferguson’s presentation is his lack of sympathy for the civilizations dismissed as “the rest,” which also points to the most serious limitation of the revisionist case. The “triumph of the West” that followed the collapse of communism in Europe was clearly not the “end of history.” As Ferguson must know, the main topic of discussion in international affairs nowadays concerns the “rise” of China, and more generally Asia, as well as the stirring of Islam. Of course, the Chinese may prefer to talk about “restoration” rather than “rise,” and point to a “harmonious” pluralism of the future. But “rise” is how most people think of China’s recent history, and in history the rise of some is usually associated with the decline of others. In other words, we may be reverting to that cyclical pattern that historians assumed to be axiomatic before the seemingly irreversible rise of the West implanted in them a view of linear progress toward greater reason and freedom. Europe is plainly in decline, politically and culturally, though most Europeans, blinded by their high living standards and the pretensions of their impotent statesmen, are happy to dress this up as progress. Chinese savings are underwriting much of the American civilizing mission that Ferguson applauds. The pattern seems clear: the West is losing dynamism, and the rest are gaining it. The remainder of this century will show how this shift plays out. For the moment, most of us have lost the historical plot. It is possible, for

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.