NLRB Justifies Notice-Posting Rule Under NLRA Authority
Summary
The passage is a legal justification for a rulemaking action by the National Labor Relations Board, containing no specific allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑profile individuals or a Cites statutory authority under NLRA Section 6 for rulemaking. References case law (Barnette, Chevron) to support deference to agency interpretation. Discusses the necessity of employee awareness for
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
NLRB proposes and finalizes rule requiring NLRA notice postings in workplaces
The passage details routine rulemaking by the National Labor Relations Board on posting employee rights notices. It contains no allegations of misconduct, financial flows, or involvement of high‑level Executive Order 13496 (2009) mandates posting NLRA rights for federal contractors. NLRB proposed and finalized a rule making notice posting an unfair labor practice if not complied wi The rule faced
NLRB proposes equitable tolling rule for NLRA notice posting requirements
The passage outlines a proposed regulatory change by the National Labor Relations Board regarding equitable tolling of the 10(b) filing period when employers fail to post required workplace notices. W NLRB seeks to treat failure to post NLRA rights notices as an unfair labor practice. Proposes equitable tolling of the 10(b) filing deadline for employees unaware of their rights. Cites extensive cas
NLRB final rule on employer posting of NLRA employee rights notices
The passage outlines procedural details of a NLRB rulemaking and comments on notice requirements. It contains no specific allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving high‑level officials, no NLRB proposes mandatory posting of detailed NLRA rights notices for covered employers. Comments suggest annual training and bans on captive‑audience meetings, but no concrete actions are Rule adopts
Federal Register discussion of NLNL notice‑posting rule and its legal justification
The passage is a routine regulatory analysis of a labor‑law notice‑posting requirement. It contains no specific allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving high‑profile officials or entities Reference to Pilchak attorneys proposing changes to the notice rule. Citations of court cases (UAW v. Chao, Brown, etc.) supporting agency authority. Discussion of historical unionization rates and t
NLRB Notice Posting Rule Discussion References Supreme Court Cases and Industry Comments
The passage is a standard regulatory filing discussing legal precedents and industry comments on a notice‑posting rule. It contains no concrete allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving hi References Supreme Court decisions (Teamsters 357, Lechmere) to justify rulemaking authority. Industry groups (U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Center on National Labor Policy, Portland Cement Associat Clai
NLRB Notice Posting Rule Debate Shows Mixed Public Comments on Employee Awareness of NLRA Rights
The passage records public comments on a proposed NLRB rule requiring workplace posting of NLRA rights. It contains no concrete leads about wrongdoing, financial flows, or high‑level officials. The on Comments are split: some claim workers already know union rights, others say they are largely unawar Employers and industry groups argue the rule is unnecessary and costly. Union and worker advocates
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.