Casual email chain among academics discussing religion and article links
Summary
The document contains a personal email exchange between Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and an unnamed individual. It discusses opinions on fanaticism and shares a New Yorker article link. There are no Email participants are public intellectuals, not government officials. No mention of financial transactions, legal matters, or policy decisions. Contains standard confidentiality disclaimer typical o
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Forwarded email exchange between Lawrence Krauss and Noam Chomsky about a contentious article
The passage contains a routine academic correspondence with no concrete allegations, transactions, or actionable leads. It mentions only two public intellectuals, neither of whom hold governmental pow Email chain dated September 10, 2015 between Lawrence Krauss and Noam Chomsky. Discussion centers on an unnamed article and the concept of ridicule in debate. No substantive claims, dates, or entitie
Email chain discussing religion, fanaticism, and academic opinions
The passage contains a casual email exchange among academics with no concrete allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful officials. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Emails involve Lawrence Krauss, a physicist, and Noam Chomsky, a linguist. Discussion centers on religious and secular fanaticism, not specific misconduct. No mention of financial transactions, government ag
Email exchange between Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and a private individual discussing religion and secular dogma
The passage contains a routine academic discussion with no concrete allegations, financial details, or links to powerful officials or agencies. It offers no actionable leads for investigation. Participants: Lawrence Krauss (ASU professor), Noam Chomsky (public intellectual), and a private ema Topic: Debate over the role of religion and secular nationalism in society. No mention of any government b
Email chain discussing religion, fanaticism, and academic opinions – no substantive lead
The passage consists of informal email exchanges between private individuals (including Lawrence Krauss and Noam Chomsky) about philosophical views on religion and secular dogma. It contains no concre Informal discussion of religion and fanaticism. Mentions of public intellectuals (Krauss, Chomsky) but no claims of wrongdoing. No references to government bodies, financial flows, or illegal activit
Email exchange between Lawrence Krauss and Noam Chomsky with no substantive allegations
The document contains a routine correspondence about an article and personal opinions, lacking any concrete leads, allegations, or connections to powerful actors or wrongdoing. It offers no actionable Email dated September 10, 2015 between Lawrence Krauss and Noam Chomsky. Mentions a New Yorker article about scientists and militant atheism. Includes Krauss' professional titles and contact informat
Lawrence Krauss forwards New Yorker article to Noam Chomsky and Jeffery
The passage contains only a routine email forwarding a public article with a standard confidentiality disclaimer. It provides no concrete leads, names, transactions, or allegations linking powerful ac Email sent by physicist Lawrence Krauss to Noam Chomsky and an unknown recipient. Includes link to a New Yorker article about scientists and militant atheism. Standard attorney‑client/confidentiality
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.