Skip to content
Case File
d-1945House OversightLegal Filing

The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that the testimony of Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, a...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1945
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that the testimony of Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly Bovino is relevant, material, and exculpatory, contradicting Jane's testimony about group sexualized massages involving Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The defense asserts that excluding this testimony would violate Maxwell's right to present a defense and confront her accusers.

Tags

Admissibility of testimony from Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly BovinoRelevance and materiality of witness testimonyConfrontation Clause and right to present a defense
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 723

The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that the testimony of Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly Bovino is relevant, material, and exculpatory, contradicting Jane's testimony about group sexualized massages involving Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The defense asserts that excluding this testimony would violate Maxwell's right to present a defense and confront her accusers.

13p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The indictment charges Ghislaine Maxwell with sex trafficking and abuse of minors, alleging that she...

The indictment charges Ghislaine Maxwell with sex trafficking and abuse of minors, alleging that she worked with Jeffrey Epstein to groom and abuse multiple minor victims between 1994 and 1997. Maxwell is accused of befriending victims, normalizing sexual abuse, and facilitating Epstein's access to minors. The alleged abuse took place at multiple locations, including Epstein's residences in New York, Florida, and New Mexico.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing related to Ghislaine Maxwell's arraignment and bail hearing, schedule...

The document is a court filing related to Ghislaine Maxwell's arraignment and bail hearing, scheduled as a remote video conference due to COVID-19. It outlines the court's protocols for the proceeding, including COVID-19 safety measures and logistical arrangements. The filing also references related cases involving Jeffrey Epstein.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The documents are court filings related to the cases against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, ...

The documents are court filings related to the cases against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing the government's arguments against their release on bail due to the serious nature of the charges and the risk of reoffending or flight.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The documents include a motion for admission pro hac vice for Jeffrey Epstein's counsel, a notice of...

The documents include a motion for admission pro hac vice for Jeffrey Epstein's counsel, a notice of appearance for Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel, and a notice of defective filing in the appeal of United States v. Epstein.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction an...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her claims that her prosecution was barred by Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, that the indictment was untimely, and that the district court erred in handling her trial. The court held that Epstein's agreement did not bind the USAO-SDNY and that Maxwell's indictment was timely under 18 U.S.C. § 3283.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.