Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-20033House OversightOther

Philosophical essay on economic axioms and population motives

The text is a theoretical discussion of economic history and biological motives with no specific individuals, transactions, dates, or allegations linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers no ac Discusses historical economic theories from Petty to Ricardo and Malthus Claims marginalist revolution ignored taste motivations Advocates restarting macroeconomic theory with motive analysis

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011048
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The text is a theoretical discussion of economic history and biological motives with no specific individuals, transactions, dates, or allegations linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers no ac Discusses historical economic theories from Petty to Ricardo and Malthus Claims marginalist revolution ignored taste motivations Advocates restarting macroeconomic theory with motive analysis

Tags

historytheoryhouse-oversighteconomics

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Tweaking the Axioms My last argument reasoned from experience that we need no money motive to consume, and that pay tends to cover our maintenance needs. But that wasn’t strictly in the axioms. | assumed a mortal and reproducing population strategizing for means to satisfy tastes, and more generally aims. I didn’t say out loud that the population in fact survives. Now I do. Let’s specify that the population has motive and means for lineage survival, whether in a group selection or kin selection sense. The means can be specified as skill sets, as an adult norm, sufficient to earn maintenance consumption needs for themselves and invested consumption needs for their young together. As to motive, I will specify at last that maintenance consumption is exhausted in satisfying our taste for survival. I already as much as assumed this in arguing that we need no money motive to consume. This assumption of motive and means amounts to the biological imperative. It is hardly new to economics. It is the essence of Petty’s overlapping generations model of 1662 in A Treatise of Taxes. It is the essence of the equilibrium wage theory of Smith in 1776 and Ricardo 1817, where pay converges to the level holding the work force intact. It is the essence of Malthus’ population principle of 1798 and 1801, chosen by Senior as his first axiom in his Outline of 1836. It is the essence of the productive consumption theory developed from Malthus through Mill in 1848. It lapsed from attention with the marginalist revolution beginning with Jevons and Menger in 1871, ironically the year of publication of Darwin’s The Descent of Man, because the marginalists treated explanations of tastes as irrelevant. I happen to be a huge fan of the marginalists. But they’ve made their point. The microeconomics they founded is a rich and mature science. It needs no assumptions as to what explains our tastes. But macro is not doing so well. I believe that it must start over, and that a grasp of motives helps. Chapter 6: Parallels with the Firm 2/4/16 14

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.