Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-20100House OversightFinancial Record

Informal email mentioning Clinton, Kagan, budget constraints and vague production plans

The passage contains only casual references to high‑profile names (Clinton, Justice Kagan) without any specific allegations, transactions, dates, or actionable details. It lacks concrete leads for inv Reference to "clinton woody kagan" with a note to not add budget funds Allusion to a prime minister reminding the writer of a personal connection from 1976 Discussion of low‑budget reality TV product

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #023448
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains only casual references to high‑profile names (Clinton, Justice Kagan) without any specific allegations, transactions, dates, or actionable details. It lacks concrete leads for inv Reference to "clinton woody kagan" with a note to not add budget funds Allusion to a prime minister reminding the writer of a personal connection from 1976 Discussion of low‑budget reality TV product

Tags

productionfinancial-flowbudgetinformal-communicationpolitical-figurespolitical-referencehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Sent: 9/24/2014 12:07:26 AM Subject: Re: Highlight Importance: — High not sure yet talk in momig On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Michael Wolff i _ ___,. wrote: Fab! And tomorrow? On Tuesday, September 23, 2014, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: clinton woody kagan , do not add one penny to budget On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Lisa New {> wrote: That was fun- definitely the highlight of a day that was not without other interesting moments Don't know which was better-- the wholly unexpected surprise reminder (by a prime minister) of my boyfriend from 1976( who was in high school, who lived with his doting parents), or , getting creamed on my producer's budget but then offered the opportunity to profess poetry for production funds . There may be someone as good in New York, but i'll never tell you and you really have a heck of a seminar table there . When do we do Whitman's "Song of Myself" 1-15 Who else is reading with us? I'm ready . A few other follow ups : David and Brigid point out that reality tv doesn't cost anything because it is, as it sounds, very low budget . No writing , no special expertise or knowledge or research , no archival footage , no copyright clearance , no actors , no travel beyond the one location , certainly no clinton or woody allen or justice elena kagan or david brooks or Lena Dunham or even Professor New. That said , I think If were hiring the crew id do it for less -- probably 1, 250,000 all in . But I haven't won 10 Emmys and David has . That has value too. As does Webh . But I'll be more prepared for the next conversation and want to be much more prepared for templeton, so thank you . T really liked Michael. I would like to send him some stuff , but in googling him I noticed that we have the same birthday! May I have his email? You are in! Yeay! Lets see what this may mean? I'll improve my numbers and you'll improve your deep reading ? Sent from my iPhone please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Vague email referencing Clinton, Woody Allen, Elena Kagan in TV production budget discussion

The passage contains only informal, speculative remarks about budget figures and mentions of high‑profile names without any concrete allegations, transactions, dates, or actionable leads. It lacks spe Mentions "clinton woody kagan, do not add one penny to budget" – no context or details. References a TV‑production budget estimate of $1,250,000 and suggests low‑cost reality TV production Names seve

1p
House OversightUnknown

Informal email chain mentioning Clinton, Kagan, and vague production budget talk

Informal email chain mentioning Clinton, Kagan, and vague production budget talk The passage contains casual, unverified remarks with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It references high‑profile figures only in passing and lacks any substantive allegation or evidence of misconduct, making it low‑value noise for investigative purposes. Key insights: Mentions "clinton" and "woody kagan" in a non‑specific context.; Discusses a hypothetical low‑budget production cost of $1.25 million.; References a prime minister and personal anecdotes unrelated to any alleged wrongdoing.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Informal email mentioning Clinton, Kagan, and budget without clear context

Informal email mentioning Clinton, Kagan, and budget without clear context The passage contains vague references to high‑profile names (Clinton, Justice Kagan) and a budget comment, but provides no concrete details, transactions, dates, or actionable leads. It reads like casual correspondence with no clear evidence of misconduct, limiting its investigative usefulness. Key insights: Mentions "clinton woody kagan" in a budget‑related comment.; Discusses low‑budget reality TV production costs.; Contains informal language and personal anecdotes, not substantive evidence.

1p
House OversightEmailNov 11, 2025

Informal email chain mentioning Clinton, Kagan, and vague production budget talk

The passage contains casual, unverified remarks with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It references high‑profile figures only in passing and lacks any substantive allegatio Mentions "clinton" and "woody kagan" in a non‑specific context. Discusses a hypothetical low‑budget production cost of $1.25 million. References a prime minister and personal anecdotes unrelated to a

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Loose email chain referencing political figures and TV production budgeting

The email contains vague, speculative remarks about budget figures and casual mentions of high‑profile names (Clinton, Kagan, Woody Allen) but provides no concrete allegations, transactions, dates, or Mentions of "Clinton" and "Woody Allen" in context of low‑budget reality TV production. Reference to a budget figure of $1,250,000 for a production. Allusion to a "prime minister" reminder about a pe

1p
House OversightUnknown

Vague email referencing Clinton, Woody Allen, Elena Kagan in TV production budget discussion

Vague email referencing Clinton, Woody Allen, Elena Kagan in TV production budget discussion The passage contains only informal, speculative remarks about budget figures and mentions of high‑profile names without any concrete allegations, transactions, dates, or actionable leads. It lacks specificity needed for investigative follow‑up, making it low‑value despite the presence of well‑known figures. Key insights: Mentions "clinton woody kagan, do not add one penny to budget" – no context or details.; References a TV‑production budget estimate of $1,250,000 and suggests low‑cost reality TV production.; Names several public figures (Clinton, Woody Allen, Justice Elena Kagan, David Brooks, Lena Dunham) in a casual, non‑specific manner.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.