House Oversight Form FD-515a Submission TemplateThe document is a transcript of a trial proceeding in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell...
Case File
d-20109House OversightEmailPhilosophical inquiry email from Moshe Hoffman to Jeffrey about social science questions
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #028974
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
The passage contains no concrete leads, names of powerful actors, financial transactions, or allegations of misconduct. It is a personal email discussing abstract research questions, offering no inves Email from Moshe Hoffman to Jeffrey ([email protected]) dated May 3, 2016. Mentions introductions to individuals named Brockman and Ehud. Lists five broad philosophical questions about morality,
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionTags
personal-correspondencesocial-sciencehouse-oversightphilosophyemail
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #028974
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Moshe Hoffman (a |
Sent: 5/3/2016 4:51:28 PM
To: jeffrey E. [[email protected]]
Subject: Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)
Importance: — High
Hi Jeff,
Thanks again for making the time for me last time you were in town. And for your introductions to Brockman
and Ehud. I have enjoyed all the conversations and been learning a lot. Hopefully, a book or two will come out
of it eventually as well. Means a lot to me.
Martin mentioned that you are thinking about the top questions in various fields and suggested I might think of
some of my own and pass them on to you.
In case you are interested, I list below the five biggest questions that keep me up at night, motivate my life's
work, and which I think ought to keep up every social scientist. Happy to discuss with you, if and when you are
interested.
-Moshe
1) Where do our moral and political views come from?
The bull shit answers most people accept clearly don't fit the facts; we are not discovering moral truths through
reason, and our political views are not motivated by a desire to achieve the best policy outcomes. So what does
drive these beliefs? And what causes them to have the weird puzzling features they do (e.g., why is a lie of
commission so much worse than a lie of omission)? And what causes them to change over time (e.g., slavery
has been accepted as moral at many points in history)? And differ across cultures (e.g., ISIS versus the U.S.)?
And across person and context (e.g., Trump vs. Bernie supporters)?
More generally, we believe and argue all sorts of crap (your vote can make a difference, Jesus loves you, all
men are created equal). How do these beliefs and arguments work? Are they just random ideas propagated by
an amorphous culture, viruses taking advantage of our own psychology for their benefit, ideas that get us to do
the bidding of their cynical designers?
2) Similarly, where do our tastes come from? Like the art we like? Or the music?
Some tastes are kinda obvious. E.g., we evolved to like young curvy women because they are the most fertile.
And maybe we like art that reminds us of this or of landscapes that are safe or what not. But there are many
aspects of art and music (e.g. modern art, rap) that are not universally pleasing. So what makes people like these
things? What properties do they need to succeed? What role does the artist or the history of the piece play in
what we like? Of course, this question isn't just about art and music, but about all of our peculiar, culturally
specific tastes. How does culture shape our tastes? Is it completely arbitrary or is there some logic to its
influence?
3) Where do our political and economic institutions come from and what causes them to have the peculiar
structure they have?
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.