Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-20289House OversightDeposition

Anonymous emails referencing Kavanaugh, prosecutors, and alleged inconsistencies in testimony

The messages contain vague, unverified allegations linking a former Supreme Court Justice (Kavanaugh) and a prosecutor to potential misconduct, but they lack concrete details, names, dates, or evidenc Multiple emails from an address ([email protected]) ask probing questions about Kavanaugh’s involv The sender criticizes a female prosecutor, suggesting she should have been a defense attorney. Ref

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #027430
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The messages contain vague, unverified allegations linking a former Supreme Court Justice (Kavanaugh) and a prosecutor to potential misconduct, but they lack concrete details, names, dates, or evidenc Multiple emails from an address ([email protected]) ask probing questions about Kavanaugh’s involv The sender criticizes a female prosecutor, suggesting she should have been a defense attorney. Ref

Tags

whistlebloweranonymous-allegationlegal-misconductlegal-exposuresupreme-courthouse-oversightanonymous-tipspotential-witness-tampering

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Flags: 1085445 Is Read: No Is Invitation: No GUID: F2D48CC6-7F98-4208-9F43-DC44EDFD90B9 Message: cool Sender: e:[email protected] Time: 09/28/18 04:00:09 AM (559825209) Flags: 1085445 Is Read: No Is Invitation: No GUID: A85F42AA-D695-41EE-8B3B- 9DE4B30BF4C4 r, Message: lots to report Sender: (i Time: 09/28/18 04:00:32 AM (559825232) Flags: 1126401 Is Read: Yes Is Invitation: No GUID: 86EC43AC-A6E3-4AB5-B42F-730F33459F61 Message: What did u think of yesterday?? Sender: e:[email protected] Time: 09/28/18 04:03:18 AM (559825398) Flags: 1085445 Is Read: No Is Invitation: No GUID: D/7E6A596-1F80-49A7-A990-BC846577C63A Message: horrible choice of prosecutor woman. critical and maybe lethal mistake. prosecutors don't cross examine. they prosecute. . power on their side . she should have been a criminal defense attorney. . is there a history of anxiety in your family, was the lights on in the bedroom.? did you ever see kavanaugh again? how many times before. ? how did you get home 8 miles from the alleged party if you did not drive.? who drove you , etc Sender: e:[email protected] Time: 09/28/18 04:07:35 AM (559825655) Flags: 1085445 Is Read: No Is Invitation: No a5 GUID: D8BEA091-EE8C-4E3B-8630-6D07DF734752 Message: who were the people on the beach you spoke to .? did you use kavanaughs name? which attys did you interview.? did you use kavauaghs name. ? the therapist notes are inconsistent with your story. . 4 boys . did you run out of the house. . how did you hear the conversation with he bathroom door closed.?

Technical Artifacts (5)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone9825209
Phone9825232
Phone9825398
Phone9825655

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.