Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in Doe v. Trump (1:16-cv-07673-RA)
Summary
The passage merely confirms that a case against Trump was voluntarily dismissed, providing no details on allegations, parties, financial flows, or misconduct. It offers a minimal lead—identifying a la Case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA filed in Southern District of New York Plaintiff listed as Jane Doe Case was voluntarily dismissed on Nov 4, 2016
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
“...r counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above- captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas) 1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been...”
United States“...l because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive o...”
Kathryn Ruemmler“From: Sent: To: Subject: Kathy Ruemmler 11/5/2016 11:56:17 AM jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Re: told you Importance: High Privile...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Voluntary dismissal filing in Doe v. Trump (SDNY) case 1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA
The passage only confirms that a plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal in a lawsuit against Donald Trump and others. It provides no details on allegations, evidence, financial flows, or involvement of Electronic filing notice from SDNY on 11/4/2016 Case number 1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA, titled Doe v. Trump et al Plaintiff (Jane Doe) voluntarily dismissed the action
Voluntary Dismissal Filing in Doe v. Trump (1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA)
The email documents a routine voluntary dismissal of a case against Donald Trump and others, providing no new factual allegations, financial details, or evidence of wrongdoing. It merely confirms that Case was filed in the Southern District of New York under number 1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA. Plaintiff listed as Jane Doe, indicating a possibly anonymous or protected claimant. The filing was entered by attor
Internal emails reveal U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta and prosecutor A. Marie Villafaria concealed victim information in prior child sex case and later ...
The passage links a sitting Cabinet member (Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta) and a senior federal prosecutor to alleged misconduct in two separate child‑sex cases, including the high‑profile Epstein pl Judge William Zloch rebuked prosecutor A. Marie Villafaria in 2007 for withholding victim history in Acosta, then U.S. Attorney, defended Villafaria’s actions and later helped draft a plea deal for J
Manuscript excerpts alleging internal chaos, legal pressure, and possible financial improprieties in the Trump White House
The passage provides a narrative of alleged internal conflicts, lawyer‑client dynamics, and speculative financial schemes (e.g., the Trump‑Epstein Palm Beach house deal, Kushner‑Apollo financing) that Alleged $55 million profit for Trump on a Palm Beach house purchased via Deutsche Bank financing and Kushner’s $184 million financing from Apollo Global Management and the suggestion that the Souther
Lawfare article notes lack of definitive OLC ban on indicting a sitting president
The passage summarizes existing Office of Legal Counsel memos and court history, highlighting that there is no clear, binding policy against indicting a sitting president. It does not introduce new ac Six historical OLC memos and briefs have addressed presidential indictment, showing no consistent po 1973 OLC memo was effectively repudiated by the Justice Department in United States v. Nixon. 2000
Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler Leads Latham & Watkins Defense of Emirates NBD in $½B Trade‑Secret Lawsuit
The passage links a high‑profile former Obama administration official to a major UAE sovereign‑wealth‑backed bank in a multi‑hundred‑million‑dollar trade‑secret case. It provides specific names, dates Kathryn Ruemmler, former White House counsel, appeared as lead counsel for Emirates NBD in a $554‑mi The case centered on alleged theft of a mobile‑payment platform (SpanCash) from entrepreneur Faroo
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.