Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-20376House OversightOther

Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in Doe v. Trump (1:16-cv-07673-RA)

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #032334
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage merely confirms that a case against Trump was voluntarily dismissed, providing no details on allegations, parties, financial flows, or misconduct. It offers a minimal lead—identifying a la Case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA filed in Southern District of New York Plaintiff listed as Jane Doe Case was voluntarily dismissed on Nov 4, 2016

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

court-filingcivil-procedurelegal-exposurehouse-oversightdismissal
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Sent: To: Subject: Kathy Ruemmler 11/5/2016 11:56:17 AM jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Re: told you Importance: High Privileged - Redacted Sent from my iPad On Nov 4, 2016, at 6:17 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: From: NYSD ECF Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov [mailto:NYSD Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 5:59 PM To: CourtMail@nysd.uscourts.gov Subject: Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump ECF Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov] et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on 11/4/2016 Case Name: Doe v. Trump et al Case Number: 1:16-cv-07673-RA Filer: Jane Doe Document Number: 15 Docket Text: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above- captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas) 1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been electronically mailed to: please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Voluntary dismissal filing in Doe v. Trump (SDNY) case 1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA

The passage only confirms that a plaintiff filed a voluntary dismissal in a lawsuit against Donald Trump and others. It provides no details on allegations, evidence, financial flows, or involvement of Electronic filing notice from SDNY on 11/4/2016 Case number 1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA, titled Doe v. Trump et al Plaintiff (Jane Doe) voluntarily dismissed the action

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Voluntary Dismissal Filing in Doe v. Trump (1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA)

The email documents a routine voluntary dismissal of a case against Donald Trump and others, providing no new factual allegations, financial details, or evidence of wrongdoing. It merely confirms that Case was filed in the Southern District of New York under number 1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA. Plaintiff listed as Jane Doe, indicating a possibly anonymous or protected claimant. The filing was entered by attor

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Internal emails reveal U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta and prosecutor A. Marie Villafaria concealed victim information in prior child sex case and later ...

The passage links a sitting Cabinet member (Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta) and a senior federal prosecutor to alleged misconduct in two separate child‑sex cases, including the high‑profile Epstein pl Judge William Zloch rebuked prosecutor A. Marie Villafaria in 2007 for withholding victim history in Acosta, then U.S. Attorney, defended Villafaria’s actions and later helped draft a plea deal for J

8p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Manuscript excerpts alleging internal chaos, legal pressure, and possible financial improprieties in the Trump White House

The passage provides a narrative of alleged internal conflicts, lawyer‑client dynamics, and speculative financial schemes (e.g., the Trump‑Epstein Palm Beach house deal, Kushner‑Apollo financing) that Alleged $55 million profit for Trump on a Palm Beach house purchased via Deutsche Bank financing and Kushner’s $184 million financing from Apollo Global Management and the suggestion that the Souther

47p
House OversightIndictmentNov 11, 2025

Lawfare article notes lack of definitive OLC ban on indicting a sitting president

The passage summarizes existing Office of Legal Counsel memos and court history, highlighting that there is no clear, binding policy against indicting a sitting president. It does not introduce new ac Six historical OLC memos and briefs have addressed presidential indictment, showing no consistent po 1973 OLC memo was effectively repudiated by the Justice Department in United States v. Nixon. 2000

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler Leads Latham & Watkins Defense of Emirates NBD in $½B Trade‑Secret Lawsuit

The passage links a high‑profile former Obama administration official to a major UAE sovereign‑wealth‑backed bank in a multi‑hundred‑million‑dollar trade‑secret case. It provides specific names, dates Kathryn Ruemmler, former White House counsel, appeared as lead counsel for Emirates NBD in a $554‑mi The case centered on alleged theft of a mobile‑payment platform (SpanCash) from entrepreneur Faroo

9p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.