NLRB Board Declines to Expand Employee Rights Notice in 2011 RulemakingConfidential disclaimer with no substantive content
Case File
d-20426House OversightOtherCourtroom transcript shows scheduling discussion, no substantive allegations
Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011458
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Summary
The excerpt contains only procedural dialogue about hearing dates and a brief mention of an 'Epstein motion' without any details on actors, financial flows, or misconduct. It offers no actionable lead Discussion of scheduling hearings on Wednesdays Reference to an 'Epstein motion' and financial records No substantive allegations or evidence presented
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionTags
court-transcripthouse-oversightproceduralepstein
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #011458
Ask AI about this document
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureText extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
10
id.
12
13
14
L5
16
ne)
18
life)
20
21
22
23
24
25
155
H3VOGIU3
MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, there's just one more thing
procedurally, if I could indulge the Court while I have your
attention before we all leave. That would be helpful.
THE COURT: Don't €eunt of. Le.
Gi
MS. McCAWLEY: Sorry.
THE COURT: Yes.
ES
MS. McCAWLEY: It's just, in your order about the ESI
and the issue with the non-production, you said that we should
suggest hearing dates. I see that your Honor has moved the
hearing dates to Wednesdays, so we were hoping to, since
there's only a few Wednesdays left before our trial, reserve
one of those to handle that hearing?
THI
Gl
COURT: Well, I'm not sure.
MS. McCAWLEY: Or whatever day would work.
THI
Gl
COURT: No. Okay. Now, it seems to me, correct
me if I'm wrong, on the 5th we're going to do Epstein's motion,
the deposition designations, the biforcation --
MR. CASSELL: I'm sorry, we just did that.
THE COURT: By the way, maybe we could do the
biforcation issue very quickly. What is it you want to --
MR. CASSELL: I think we just did that a few moments
ago, your Honor.
MS. McCAWLEY: That was the one about the financial
15
records.
=
THE COURT: By what?
es
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.