Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-20553House Oversight

Historical commentary on obscenity regulation and Supreme Court decisions

Other

The passage offers a retrospective opinion on legal theory regarding pornographic films and mentions historical judges, but provides no concrete leads, transactions, or allegations involving current p Claims that pornographic films lack constitutional immunity despite adult consent. References to Judge Aldrich and Chief Justice Warren E. Burger in the context of obscenity cases. Suggests a gap bet

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017192
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.