Skip to main content
Skip to content
Court dialogue on obscenity case involving Grove Press and alleged First Amendment misuseCertificate of Service for House Oversight Filing (Feb 3, 2016)
Case File
d-20584House OversightOther

Jane Doe filings allege Jeffrey Epstein trafficked victims to numerous high‑profile politicians, business leaders, foreign presidents and a prime m...

The passage provides a concrete allegation that a non‑party (Jane Doe 3) can identify specific “prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well‑known Prime Min Jane Doe 3 claims she can prove how a non‑party introduced her to Epstein and that he trafficked her Alleged victims include “numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, fo

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014851
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides a concrete allegation that a non‑party (Jane Doe 3) can identify specific “prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well‑known Prime Min Jane Doe 3 claims she can prove how a non‑party introduced her to Epstein and that he trafficked her Alleged victims include “numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, fo

Persons Referenced (2)

Jane Does

“...ernment violated their rights under the CVRA. The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim (i.e., that they...”

Jeffrey Epstein

“Case 9:0&aé807E5-d0A07 4 oA nilkxeinteniteréd-49 FES@0 DGCkét104/7dQ616 ofPidge 5 of 10 Jeffrey Epstein, and (2) the Government violated their CVRA rights by concealing the non- prosecution agreement wit...”

Tags

sexual-traffickingjeffrey-epsteingovernment-misconductforeign-influencenonprosecution-agreementpolitical-corruptiongovernment-coveruplegal-exposurecivil-rightshouse-oversightmoderate-importancesexual-misconduct
View on oversight.house.gov
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #014851

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:0&aé807E5-d0A07 4 oA nilkxeinteniteréd-49 FES@0 DGCkét104/7dQ616 ofPidge 5 of 10 Jeffrey Epstein, and (2) the Government violated their CVRA rights by concealing the non- prosecution agreement with them. (DE 280 at 3; see id. at 7-8). However, the bulk of the Rule 21 Motion consists of copious factual details that Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 “would prove” “[i]f allowed to join this action.” (Id. at 3, 7). Specifically, Jane Doe 3 proffers that she could prove the circumstances under which a non-party introduced her to Mr. Epstein, and how Mr. Epstein sexually trafficked her to several high-profile non-party individuals, “including numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known Prime Minister, and other world leaders.” (Id. at 3-6). She names several individuals, and she offers details about the type of sex acts performed and where they took place. (See id. at 5).’ At this juncture in the proceedings, these lurid details are unnecessary to the determination of whether Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 should be permitted to join Petitioners’ claim that the Government violated their rights under the CVRA. The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim (i.e., that they were known victims of Mr. Epstein and the Government owed them CVRA duties), especially considering that these details involve non-parties who are not related to the respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken. The original Rule 21 Motion (DE 279) shall be stricken in its entirety, as it is wholly superseded by the “corrected” version of the Rule 21 Motion (DE 280). From the corrected Rule 21 Motion, the Court shall strike all factual details regarding Jane Doe 3 between the following sentences: “The Government then concealed from Jane Doe #3 the existence of its NPA from * Jane Doe 4’s proffer is limited to sexual acts between Mr. Epstein and herself. (See DE 280 at 7-8).

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01351137

Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein-cancelled From: Paul Morris Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:25:48 -0500 To: Lesley Groff Classification: Public Lesley, can you pass along my contact info to todd m when you get a minute. Thanks and best Original Message From: Paul Morris Sent: 02/28/2013 04:18 PM EST To: "Lesley Groff" Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein-cancelled Classification: Public Yes thanks Original Messaie From: Lesley Groff Sent: 02/28/2013 03:57 PM EST To: Paul Morris Subject: J

1p
OtherUnknown

The Morgan Account

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01340333

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01344802

From: Lesley Groff Sent: 1/14/2015 8:11:19 AM To: Paul Morris Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein IC] HI Paul Jeffrey says your boss alone is fine-..can you let me know if he would be available to come by and see Jeffrey at 11:15 on Thursday (tomorrow!) Also, what is his name? On Jan 13, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Paul Morris a wrote: > Classification: Confidential > • Hi I'm in LA and not back until thurs night, let me see if I can make a few changes and come back to you in the am, thx orig

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01402942

Subject: RE: CLEARED: PCR Alert - Jeffrey Epstein [I] From: Vaishali-P Mehta Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:37:26 -0400 To: Jj Litchford Classification: For internal use only Either Kim or Andrew one of these 2 Vaishali Mehta AVP Anti-Money Laundering Business Risk Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management 60 Wall Street, 27th Floor, 10005-2836 New York, NY, USA Tel. Mobile Email fcid:[email protected] fcid:[email protected] Fr

7p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02726140

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

JANE DOE I JEFFREY EPSTEIN LITIGATION

JANE DOE I JEFFREY EPSTEIN LITIGATION RELEVANT PLEADINGS Docket No. Date Description 12 6/20/08 Defendant's Motion to Stay 13 6/20/08 Defendant's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer 16 7/1/08 Defendant's Notice Concerning Motion to Stay 23 7/17/08 Defendant's Motion to File Ex Parte and Under Seal 24 7/17/08 Defendant's "Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action" 31 7/29/08 Defendant's Notice of Filing Exhibits (Attaching Villafaiia Declaration from victims' rights suit) 33 8/5/08 Order Denying Motion to Stay 34 8/5/08 Order Denying Motion to Seal 37 8/12/08 Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal 38 8/12/08 Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion to Stay 40 9/4/08 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint 41 9/22/08 Plaintiff's Memorandum in Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint 45 9/30/08 Order Setting Trial Date and Discovery Deadlines 46 10/6/08 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint and Motion fo

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.