Skip to content
Case File
d-206House OversightLegal Filing

This is a reply memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in support of her renewed motion f...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-206
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

This is a reply memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in support of her renewed motion for bail in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is part of the legal proceedings against Maxwell. It outlines the legal arguments and reasoning in favor of granting Maxwell bail.

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bailLegal arguments in support of bailProcedural matters in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

This is a reply memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in support of her renewed motion f...

This is a reply memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in support of her renewed motion for bail in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is part of the criminal case proceedings against Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The memorandum is submitted by her legal team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of a ...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of a protective order for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the order was not a final decision and did not fall within the collateral order exception. The court also denied Maxwell's request for a writ of mandamus and her motion to consolidate the appeal with a related civil case.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction fo...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction for sex trafficking and related charges, rejecting her arguments that her prosecution was barred by Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement and that the statute of limitations had expired. The court also found that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Maxwell's motion for a new trial and that her sentence was procedurally reasonable.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

Ghislaine Maxwell appeals her June 29, 2022, conviction for sex trafficking and related crimes. The ...

Ghislaine Maxwell appeals her June 29, 2022, conviction for sex trafficking and related crimes. The District Court imposed concurrent prison terms of 60, 120, and 240 months. The appeal is before the United States Court of Appeals.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team filed a motion requesting a severance and separate trial for Counts...

Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team filed a motion requesting a severance and separate trial for Counts Five and Six of the Superseding Indictment. The motion was filed on January 25, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The defense team is led by attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The documents include a motion for admission pro hac vice for Jeffrey Epstein's counsel, a notice of...

The documents include a motion for admission pro hac vice for Jeffrey Epstein's counsel, a notice of appearance for Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel, and a notice of defective filing in the appeal of United States v. Epstein.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.