1 duplicate copy in the archive
Congressional hearing transcript shows attorney‑client privilege objection in questioning about alleged abuse by Professor Alan Dershowitz
The passage merely records a standard privilege objection during a hearing on alleged abuse allegations. It provides no new names, dates, financial transactions, or actionable leads beyond the already Witness objects to answering questions that may reveal attorney‑client communications of Virginia Ro The line of questioning concerns whether other young women reported abuse by Professor Dershowitz.
Summary
The passage merely records a standard privilege objection during a hearing on alleged abuse allegations. It provides no new names, dates, financial transactions, or actionable leads beyond the already Witness objects to answering questions that may reveal attorney‑client communications of Virginia Ro The line of questioning concerns whether other young women reported abuse by Professor Dershowitz.
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
[REDACTED - Survivor] Deposition May 2016
Case Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 of 89 EXHIBIT Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 2 of 89 GIUFFRE VS. MAXWELL Deposition [REDACTED - Survivor] 05/03/2016 _______________________________________________________________________ Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. 216 16th Street, Suite 600 Denver Colorado, 80202 303-296-0017 Agren Blando Court Reporting & Video, Inc. Page 3 of 89 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-32 Filed 07/30/20 Page 1 IN THE UNI
Alan Dershowitz and [REDACTED - Survivor] dispute defamation claims in court filing
Alan Dershowitz and [REDACTED - Survivor] dispute defamation claims in court filing The passage offers a vague claim of innocence and a challenge to sue for defamation, mentioning high‑profile names (Alan Dershowitz, a Trump defender) but provides no concrete evidence, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It is largely a statement of dispute rather than a verifiable allegation, limiting investigative usefulness. Key insights: Roberts' lawyer admits her claims are "wrong" in front of witnesses.; Accusations involve alleged false sexual claims against an unnamed party.; Alan Dershowitz is referenced in connection with the Roberts allegations.
Dershowitz Lawsuit Against Netflix
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ------------------------------------------------------------------------x ALAN DERSHOWITZ, | Civil Action No. | Plaintiff, | | -against - | | NETFLIX, INC., LEROY & MORTON | PRODUCTIONS LLC, RADICALMEDIA LLC, | LISA BRYANT and JOSEPH BERLINGER, | | Defendants. | ------------------------------------------------------------------------x COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Alan Dershowitz (hereinafter, “Professor Dershowitz”)
Epstein lawsuit filings reference high‑profile figures and alleged secret‑service evidence
The passage cites ongoing civil litigation that seeks to depose former President Clinton, Donald Trump, and Alan Dershowitz, and claims secret‑service records prove their presence on Epstein’s island. Brad Edwards sued the federal government under the Crime Victim Rights Act for alleged rights violat [REDACTED - Survivor] is attempting to overturn her original settlement and sue Epstein for $50 million
Alan Dershowitz claims exoneration from [REDACTED - Survivor]' alleged Epstein‑related accusations
Alan Dershowitz claims exoneration from [REDACTED - Survivor]' alleged Epstein‑related accusations The passage provides a self‑served narrative and references to sealed evidence, FBI review, and Secret Service records that could, if verified, expose a coordinated framing effort involving high‑profile figures. However, it lacks concrete, independently verifiable documents, dates, or transaction details, limiting immediate investigative utility. Key insights: Dershowitz alleges he produced travel, phone, credit‑card and TV appearance records disproving Roberts' claims.; He says a former FBI director, a former assistant U.S. attorney, and a chief federal marshal reviewed the records and refuted the allegations.; Mentions sealed emails, a manuscript and a legal brief that he claims are “smoking guns” of a financial framing.
The Sad Sordid Tale of Bill Clinton and Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein
The Sad, Sordid Tale of Bill Clinton and Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein | http://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/the-sad-sordid-tale-of-bill-clinton-and-sex-offender-jeffrey-epstein/[6/19/2019 3:39:00 PM] MOST POPULAR » PRESIDENT TRUMP'S BIGGEST QUESTION FINALLY ANSWERED...CLICK HERE Home About Us Latest News Contact Us The Sad, Sordid Tale of Bill Clinton and Sex Offender Jeffrey Epstein 12 Shares Among the people closely associated with Bill and Hillary Clinton, one name stands out that h
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.