Skip to content
Case File
d-212House OversightLegal Filing

The court ordered the defendant detained pending trial, citing the risk of flight and rejecting alte...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-212
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The court ordered the defendant detained pending trial, citing the risk of flight and rejecting alternative measures such as electronic monitoring. The decision was based on factors including the nature of the crimes charged and the defendant's characteristics. The court's ruling was made in accordance with the Bail Reform Act.

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

Bail Reform Actdetention pending trialrisk of flight
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing submitted by the Acting United States Attorney, Audrey Strauss, and A...

The document is a court filing submitted by the Acting United States Attorney, Audrey Strauss, and Assistant United States Attorneys, arguing that the defendant's renewed bail motion should be denied due to the risk of flight. The court had previously found that the defendant poses a substantial actual risk of flight, and the government asserts that no conditions of bail can mitigate this risk. The motion is dated December 16, 2020.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The United States Attorney's office submits a response opposing the defendant's third bail motion, a...

The United States Attorney's office submits a response opposing the defendant's third bail motion, arguing that the proposed bail conditions are insufficient to mitigate the risk of flight. The government contends that the court should deny the motion due to the defendant's continued risk of flight. The document is signed by Audrey Strauss, United States Attorney, and several Assistant United States Attorneys.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The Court remains unconvinced that the Defendant's proposed conditions, including renunciation of ci...

The Court remains unconvinced that the Defendant's proposed conditions, including renunciation of citizenship and oversight of financial affairs, sufficiently mitigate the risk of flight. The Court is concerned that the Defendant could still resist or delay extradition, incentivizing her to flee.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document analyzes the Bail Reform Act and relevant case law, discussing the standards for pretri...

The document analyzes the Bail Reform Act and relevant case law, discussing the standards for pretrial detention and the rebuttable presumption that arises when a defendant is charged with certain offenses. The court considers the defendant's third motion for bail, arguing that new conditions and the strength of the government's case warrant reconsideration.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court denies the defendant's renewed bail application, concluding that she remains a flight risk...

The court denies the defendant's renewed bail application, concluding that she remains a flight risk due to the serious nature of the charges, her international ties, and significant financial resources. The court finds that new information presented does not alter its initial assessment.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court filing discusses the defendant's financial resources and argues that the proposed bail pac...

The court filing discusses the defendant's financial resources and argues that the proposed bail package is insufficient to ensure the defendant's appearance in court. The court notes that the defendant's spouse's assets largely originated from the defendant, reducing the moral suasion of the spouse co-signing the bond. The court ultimately concludes that detention is warranted due to the defendant's foreign ties, ability to live in hiding, and financial resources.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.