The document discusses the defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million bail package a...
Summary
The document discusses the defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million bail package and other conditions to address concerns regarding risk of flight. The court has inherent authority to reconsider its previous bail decision, and the defendant's new proposal aims to address the court's original concerns. The proposed conditions include a personal recognizance bond, home confinement with GPS monitoring, and restricted travel.
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant...
The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant poses a significant flight risk and that the government's case remains strong despite the defendant's pretrial motions. The court should deny the defendant's motion for bail due to the risk of flight and lack of new information.
The document discusses Mr. Robertson's request for reconsideration of his pretrial release, citing n...
The document discusses Mr. Robertson's request for reconsideration of his pretrial release, citing new evidence and changed circumstances due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court initially denied his release due to concerns about his appearance and community safety. The defendant now points to additional trial continuances and new placement options as grounds for reconsideration.
The court filing discusses the defendant's financial resources and argues that the proposed bail pac...
The court filing discusses the defendant's financial resources and argues that the proposed bail package is insufficient to ensure the defendant's appearance in court. The court notes that the defendant's spouse's assets largely originated from the defendant, reducing the moral suasion of the spouse co-signing the bond. The court ultimately concludes that detention is warranted due to the defendant's foreign ties, ability to live in hiding, and financial resources.
The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion for reconsideration of bail, citing the court'...
The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion for reconsideration of bail, citing the court's previous denial and distinguishing the defendant's case from other high-profile cases where bail was granted. The court had previously found the defendant to have significant foreign connections and a history of hiding resources.
The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion for reconsideration of bail, citing the court'...
The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion for reconsideration of bail, citing the court's previous consideration and rejection of similar precedent. The court had distinguished the defendant's case from others due to her significant foreign connections and financial sophistication.
The court ordered the defendant detained pending trial, citing the risk of flight and rejecting alte...
The court ordered the defendant detained pending trial, citing the risk of flight and rejecting alternative measures such as electronic monitoring. The decision was based on factors including the nature of the crimes charged and the defendant's characteristics. The court's ruling was made in accordance with the Bail Reform Act.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.