9/11 Victims’ Plaintiffs Argue Material Support Claims Should Survive Statute‑of‑Limitations Challenges
Summary
The passage outlines procedural arguments in a 9/11‑related tort case, citing statutes of limitations and equitable tolling. It does not reveal new actors, financial flows, or undisclosed misconduct, Plaintiffs allege defendants provided knowing material support to al‑Qaeda that enabled 9/11 attacks The district court dismissed negligence, NIED, and intentional tort claims on statute‑of‑limitatio
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Allegations of Threats and Duress by Wealthy Defendants Including Donald Trump in Sexual Abuse Lawsuit
The passage alleges that a defendant identified as Trump threatened a sexual assault plaintiff with death, invoking duress to toll the statute of limitations. If true, this ties a former president to Plaintiff claims she was threatened with death by each defendant to silence her. Defendant identified as "Trump" allegedly warned the plaintiff not to speak or she would "disappear The alleged threa
Court opinion on Alien Tort Statute claims related to alleged material support for al‑Qaeda
The passage is a legal brief discussing procedural arguments and statutory interpretation. It does not introduce new factual leads, names of individuals, financial transactions, or undisclosed actors. Plaintiffs allege defendants funded al‑Qaeda in Sudan during the early 1990s. District court dismissed ATS claims for lack of alleged hijacking‑specific allegations. The brief argues ATS covers broad
Appeal urges court to allow jurisdictional discovery into Saudi-linked sovereign defendants in 9/11 litigation
The passage indicates plaintiffs are seeking discovery to determine whether NCB (National Commercial Bank) and other defendants are instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which could expose f Plaintiffs argue NCB is an instrumentality of Saudi Arabia and request jurisdictional discovery. The appeal seeks reversal of dismissals of sovereign defendants under FSIA. Approximately 20 defendant
Doe v. Trump et al – Civil docket filing for assault, libel & slander case
The document is a routine docket entry showing that a plaintiff filed a civil suit against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no substantive allegations, evidence, financial transactions Case filed on 06/20/2016 in SDNY, assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Plaintiff uses the pseudonym Jane Doe; represented by Thomas F. Meagher. Defendants listed: Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein.
Court Order Scheduling Initial Conference in Jane Doe v. Donald J. Trump & Jeffrey E. Epstein (SDNY)
The document is a routine docket order setting a status conference and outlining procedural requirements. It confirms that a civil case involving a pseudonymous plaintiff against Trump and Epstein was Case number 1:16‑cv‑07673‑RA filed in Southern District of New York. Plaintiff is a Jane Doe using a pseudonym. Defendants listed are Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein.
Civil lawsuit filed by Jane Doe alleging assault, libel and slander against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein
The docket entry confirms a formal complaint linking Trump and Epstein to alleged assault and defamation, providing a concrete legal filing that could be a starting point for further investigation. Ho Complaint filed on 06/20/2016 in SDNY (Case #1:16‑cv‑04642‑RA) Plaintiff uses pseudonym "Jane Doe" and is represented by Thomas F. Meagher Defendants include Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.