The document is a transcript of a court proceeding in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, where the judge d...
Summary
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, where the judge denies the defendant's motion for a mistrial and discusses the handling of sensitive information related to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund. The court orders a protective order to safeguard confidential information and provides guidance on how to protect the identities of certain individuals during testimony.
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The US Government filed a letter opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call victim lawyers Jack Sc...
The US Government filed a letter opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call victim lawyers Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman as witnesses, arguing that their testimony is irrelevant and would compromise attorney-client privilege. The Government contends that the victims themselves have already testified and been cross-examined, making the lawyers' testimony unnecessary. The court must decide whether to allow the defendant to call these lawyers as witnesses.
Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team requests the court's permission to modify the Protective Order to all...
Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team requests the court's permission to modify the Protective Order to allow the use of certain discovery materials in other related matters, and to file some materials under seal. The request is made pursuant to paragraph 18 of the court's Protective Order. The defendant seeks to disclose discovery materials produced by the government to judicial officers in other cases.
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-tr...
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.
The court order addresses Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-trial motions, adopting her proposed redactions an...
The court order addresses Ghislaine Maxwell's pre-trial motions, adopting her proposed redactions and some additional ones suggested by the government to protect sensitive information and third-party privacy. The court applies the Lugosch test to justify the redactions, and orders the defendant to file the redacted documents by February 5, 2021.
The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discuss...
The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, discussing the proposed redactions to court documents in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The parties have reached an agreement on redactions to Exhibit 11 and the defendant's cover letter. The Government is submitting its omnibus memorandum of law with proposed redactions under seal for the Court's consideration.
The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the...
The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case, discussing the government's concerns and requests related to the defendant's use of Rule 17(c) subpoenas. The government argues that Rule 17(c) is not a discovery device and requests the court to direct the defendant to provide notice of subpoenas and to mark productions as confidential. The letter provides an overview of the legal standards governing Rule 17(c) subpoenas.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.