Plaintiffs allege Saudi princes and Kingdom aided 9/11 via charitable support, raising FSIA jurisdiction questions
Summary
The passage outlines a novel legal theory linking Saudi royalty and the Saudi government to the 9/11 attacks through alleged material support via charities. While it does not provide concrete financia Claims that Prince Sultan and Prince Turki, on behalf of Saudi Arabia, aided al Qaeda through charit Argument that the FSIA terrorism exception (§1605(a)(7)) should apply despite the alleged support
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Saudi High Commission claims FSIA immunity in 9/11 terrorism funding lawsuit
The passage reveals that the Saudi High Commission (SHC), a Saudi government‑created aid agency, asserted sovereign immunity under the FSIA while being sued for allegedly funding terrorists linked to SHC was created by the Saudi Council of Ministers to provide aid to Bosnia and is staffed by Saudi c Plaintiffs allege two Saudi officials used their official positions to fund terrorist groups via I
Saudi charities alleged as instrumentalities of the Kingdom in 9/11 litigation
The passage outlines plaintiffs' claims that several Saudi charities function as arms of the Saudi government and funded 9/11, but the court dismisses the claims on sovereign immunity grounds. While t Plaintiffs name specific charities (MWL, IIRO, WAMY, Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, Rabita Trust, e References to Senate sub‑committee testimony and independent task‑force reports on Saudi terrorist
Plaintiffs Seek to Pierce Saudi Sovereign Immunity Over 9/11 Allegations Involving Prince Salman and Prince Naif
The passage outlines a legal strategy to overcome FSIA sovereign immunity for Saudi officials tied to 9/11, offering concrete leads—names, official titles, and specific legal arguments—that could be p Claims allege Prince Salman (President of SHC, Governor of Riyadh) and Prince Naif (Minister of Inte Plaintiffs rely on the FSIA torts exception to bypass sovereign immunity, arguing the acts were no
Saudi Princes Sultan and Turki sued for alleged tortious aid to al Qaeda via charitable donations
The passage outlines a civil suit alleging that Prince Sultan and Prince Turki of Saudi Arabia knowingly funded charities that supported al Qaeda, linking them directly to the 9/11 attacks. It provide Plaintiffs allege Prince Sultan and Prince Turki aided terrorism through donations to Islamic charit Claims assert the princes knew or should have known the charities supported al Qaeda. The suit inv
Appeal urges court to allow jurisdictional discovery into Saudi-linked sovereign defendants in 9/11 litigation
The passage indicates plaintiffs are seeking discovery to determine whether NCB (National Commercial Bank) and other defendants are instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which could expose f Plaintiffs argue NCB is an instrumentality of Saudi Arabia and request jurisdictional discovery. The appeal seeks reversal of dismissals of sovereign defendants under FSIA. Approximately 20 defendant
Court denies amendment to add additional Jane Doe plaintiffs in CVRA case
The passage discusses procedural arguments about adding parties to a civil rights case and does not reveal any new allegations, financial flows, or involvement of high‑profile officials. It offers no Petitioners seek to add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as parties but the court finds it unnecessary. Government argues Jane Doe 4 lacks standing because she was not known when a non‑prosecution agreeme T
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.