Court filing disputes joinder of Jane Doe #3's allegations against Prof. Alan Dershowitz
Summary
The passage merely outlines procedural arguments over whether a plaintiff’s allegations should be joined to an existing case and references unverified claims of sexual misconduct. It provides no concr Defendant (Prof. Dershowitz) seeks to strike alleged false allegations or to intervene if joinder is Jane Doe #3 is accused of fabricating claims with a “financial motive” after a seven‑year delay. T
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Discovery Dispute Over Alan Dershowitz's Document Control in Defamation Suit
The passage outlines a procedural battle over production of documents and metadata in a defamation case involving Alan Dershowitz. While it flags potential evidence that could expose communications or Plaintiffs allege Dershowitz is withholding documents and metadata under the claim of ‘control’. The objection is framed as ‘word play’ and gamesmanship, suggesting possible intentional concealment D
Court hearing references alleged accusations involving world leaders and Alan Dershowitz in a sexual‑abuse case
The passage hints at a claim that a plaintiff’s statement links high‑profile figures (unspecified world leaders and Alan Dershowitz) to alleged wrongdoing, suggesting a possible foreign‑influence or e Plaintiff’s statement reportedly mentions "world leaders" and Alan Dershowitz as part of alleged lie Defense counsel argues the plaintiff would lose if she cannot prove Maxwell’s role. The court appe
Court filing lists motions to admit allegations linking Bill Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, foreign presidents and Prince Andrew
The document references several high‑profile figures (Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, foreign presidents) in the context of admissibility motions, suggesting possible cl Motion to admit claim that the plaintiff met Bill Clinton on Epstein’s private island twice. Reference to stories involving Alan Dershowitz and foreign presidents as “highly relevant”. Inclusion of P
Jane Doe #3 cites questionable case law to implicate Prof. Alan Dershowitz in alleged Epstein abuse
The passage suggests a possible strategy to use a misinterpreted precedent to attack a high‑profile attorney, linking him to the Jeffrey Epstein sexual‑abuse allegations. While it names a well‑known f Jane Doe #3 quotes an outdated case (Calloway v. Westinghouse) to argue against intervention rights. The quoted case is mischaracterized; the omitted text is crucial to its meaning. Dershowitz is men
Certificate of Service listing counsel for Dershowitz and plaintiffs
The document only provides a service certificate with email addresses and law firm contacts. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or actions linking powerful actors to misconduct Date of service: April 9, 2015 Counsel for defendant Alan Dershowitz listed (Sigrid S. McCawley, Thomas E. Scott, Steven R. Safra) Counsel for plaintiffs listed (Jack Scarola, SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA B
Alleged false statements linking plaintiff to sex‑slave claims and references to Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, and Virginia Giuffre in a courtr...
The passage cites high‑profile figures (Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, Virginia Giuffre) in a context that questions the credibility of a plaintiff’s sex‑slave allegations and suggests possible man The filing alleges the plaintiff misrepresented her status as a sex slave to police. Reference to an email between the plaintiff and Alan Dershowitz (page GMOO09). Citation of Virginia Giuffre’s stat
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.