Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-22637House Oversight

Lawyer recounts decision to file Supreme Court petition in Tison death‑penalty case

Other

The passage is a personal narrative about litigation strategy and ethical considerations in a death‑penalty appeal. It mentions no new allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving high‑level Attorney received pressure from anti‑death‑penalty advocates not to file certiorari. Discusses the potential impact of a Supreme Court ruling on other death‑row inmates. Describes the strategic hope

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017257
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.