Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-22706House OversightFBI Report

White House staffer Michael Porter’s alleged abuse and affair with Hope Hicks linked to FBI clearance issues and possible cover‑up

The passage provides specific names (Michael Porter, Hope Hicks, Samantha Dravis, Lewandowski), dates (Feb 1 2018 Daily Mail story, Feb 7 2018 resignation), and claims of FBI clearance manipulation an Porter allegedly accessed his raw FBI clearance reports to view ex‑wives’ statements. Porter’s affair with Hope Hicks and abuse claims were allegedly known to White House counsel staff. Samantha Drav

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #021128
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides specific names (Michael Porter, Hope Hicks, Samantha Dravis, Lewandowski), dates (Feb 1 2018 Daily Mail story, Feb 7 2018 resignation), and claims of FBI clearance manipulation an Porter allegedly accessed his raw FBI clearance reports to view ex‑wives’ statements. Porter’s affair with Hope Hicks and abuse claims were allegedly known to White House counsel staff. Samantha Drav

Tags

political-staffwhite-housesecurity-clearance-breachfbi-clearancelegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightabuse-allegationsmedia-leaksexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
8 MICHAEL WOLFF Porter had, before the age of forty, two bitter ex-wives, at least one of whom he had beaten, and both of whom he had cheated on at talk- of-the-town levels. During a stint as a Senate staffer, the married Porter had an affair with an intern, costing him his job. His girlfriend Samantha Dravis had moved in with Porter in the summer of 2017, while, quite unbeknownst to her, he was seeing Hicks. “I cheated on you because you're not attractive enough,” he later told Dravis. In a potentially criminal break of protocol, Porter had gained access to his raw FBI clearance reports and seen the statements of his ex-wives. His most recent ex-wife had also written a blog about his alleged abuse, which, while it did not name him, clearly fingered him. Concerned about the damaging impact his former wives could have on his security review, he recruited Dravis to help him smooth his relationship with both women. Lewandowski, Hicks’s former boyfriend, caught wind of the Hicks- Porter relationship and began working to expose it; by some reports, he got paparazzi to follow Hicks. Though Porter’s history of abuse was slowly making its way to the surface as a result of the FBI investigation, the Lewandowski campaign against Hicks cut through many other efforts to cover up Porter’s transgressions. Dravis, in the autumn of 2017, heard the Lewandowski-pushed rumors of the Hicks-Porter relationship. After finding Hicks’s number listed under a man’s name in Porter's contacts, Dravis confronted Porter, who promptly threw her out. Moving back in with her parents, she began her own revenge campaign, openly talking about Porter's security clear- ance issues, including to people inside the White House counsel's office, saying he had protection at the highest levels in the White House. Then, along with Lewandowski, Dravis helped leak the details of the Hicks- Porter romance to the Daily Mail, which published a story about it on February 1. But Dravis, joined by Porter's former wives, decided that, outra- geously, he had come out looking good in the Daily Mail account—he was part of a glam power couple! Porter called Dravis to taunt her: “You thought you could get me!” Dravis and his former wives all then publicly revealed their abuse at his hand. His first wife said he kicked and punched her; she even produced a photograph of her black eye. His second wife SIEGE - informed the media that she had filed an emergency protective orc against him. The White House, or at least Kelly—and likely Hicks—had been aw: of many of these claims and, effectively, covered them up. (“You usua have enough competent people for White House positions to weed out t wife beaters, but you couldn't be so choosy in the Trump White House,’ sz one Republican acquaintance of Porter's.) The furor that erupted arou Porter and his troubling gross-guy history not only annoyed Trump “He stinks of bad press”—it further weakened Kelly. On February 7, af both of his former wives gave interviews to CNN, Porter resigned. A publicity-shy Hicks—Donald Trump put a high value on associa’ who did not steal his press opportunities—suddenly found her love | in the glare of intense international press scrutiny. Her affair with the d credited Porter highlighted her own odd relationship with the preside and his family, as well as the haphazard management, interpersonal d: functions, and general lack of political savvy in the Trump court. + + The affair was, curiously, among the least of Hicks’s problems. Indeed, 1 Hicks the Porter scandal became perhaps a better cloud under which leave the administration than what almost everybody in the West Wi assumed was the real cloud. On February 27, a reporter at the Washington insider newsletter Axi Jonathan Swan, a favorite conduit for White House leaks, reported tl Josh Raffel was leaving the White House. In a novel arrangement, Rai had come into the White House in April 2017 as the exclusive spokespers for the president's son-in-law Jared Kushner, and his wife, Ivanka, bypa ing the White House communications team. Raffel, who, like Kushn was a Democrat, had worked for Hiltzik Strategies, the New York pub relations firm that represented Ivanka’s clothing line. Hope Hicks, who had also worked for the Hiltzik firm—perhaps b. known for having long represented the film producer Harvey Weinste caught, in the fall of 2017, in an epochal harassment and abuse scanc and cover-up—had originally had the same role as Raffel but at a higt level: she was the personal spokesperson for the president. In Septemb

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Landon Thomas email hints at market moves tied to Trump‑related source

Landon Thomas email hints at market moves tied to Trump‑related source The email suggests the sender knows someone close to "DT" (likely Donald Trump) and is discussing the possibility of profiting from market activity. It provides a vague lead—no names, amounts, or concrete transactions—but it links a financial reporter to a potential insider source connected to the President, which could merit further verification. The lack of specifics limits its immediate investigative utility. Key insights: Reference to "DT" likely denotes Donald Trump, implying a personal connection.; Sender asks if the recipient is tempted to take money off the table in the markets, hinting at possible market‑moving information.; Email includes a link to a Michael Wolff article about Trump, suggesting the conversation is about Trump‑related news.

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Steve Bannon <I

5p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email notes that Tom Barrack, Michael Wolff, and Donald Trump were once friends

The passage merely states a personal connection among three individuals without any specifics about transactions, wrongdoing, or actionable leads. It offers minimal investigative value, low controvers Michael Wolff references a past friendship between Tom Barrack and Donald Trump. The email includes a standard confidentiality disclaimer. No concrete allegations, dates, or financial details are pro

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email referencing Michael Wolff book on Donald Trump

The passage contains only a casual email forwarding a media link about a book. It lacks concrete details, names of wrongdoing, financial flows, or actionable leads involving powerful actors. The only Sender Stephen Hanson forwards a link to a New York Magazine article about Michael Wolff's book on D The email includes a generic confidentiality disclaimer but no substantive confidential content. N

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

5122 a 2, 1:31 PM

5122 a 2, 1:31 PM WIKIPEDIA Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia Jeffrey Epstein Jeffrey Edward Epstein (flpstin/ EP-steenAl January 20, 1953 — August to, 2019) was an American financier and convicted sex offender.13)[4] Epstein, who was born and raised in Brooklyn, New York Citr, began his professional life by teaching at the Dalton School in Manhattan, despite lacking a college degree. After his dismiccsl from the school, he entered the banking and finance sector, working at Bear Stearns in various roles; he eventually started his own firm. Epstein developed an elite social circle and procured many women and children; he and some of his associates then sexually abused them Is&DNA. In zoo ice in Palm Beach Florida be an investi atin Epstein after a parent complained that he had sexually abused her 14-year-old dauv,hter.g. Epstein pleaded guilty and was convicted in 2008 by a Florida state court of procuring a child for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute.a-9.1 He ser

24p
House OversightUnknown

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests

iMessage thread hints at paid media production, high‑level political figures, and covert coordination with foreign interests The conversation contains multiple actionable clues – a $100k invoice, references to a ‘cast’ for filming, mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, Michael Wolff, and Chinese market manipulation – that suggest a coordinated media or influence operation involving powerful political actors and foreign financial interests. While the specifics are vague, the repeated references to payments, legal arrangements, and government sensitivity provide concrete follow‑up leads (e.g., trace the $100k invoice, identify the production crew, locate the ‘letter to Burke’, and verify the alleged Chinese market influence). The content is moderately controversial and ties to high‑profile individuals, warranting further investigation. Key insights: Reference to sending an invoice for $100k to Darren – potential payment for services.; Discussion of assembling a ‘cast’ and filming on an island, with government interest in controlling press.; Mentions of Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, and Bannon in a context suggesting exploitation or coordinated messaging.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.