Skip to content
Case File
d-22930House OversightOther

Attorney Edwards alleges U.S. Attorney's Office withheld evidence from Epstein victim representatives

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #013333
Pages
1
Persons
1

Summary

The passage suggests possible obstruction or selective disclosure by the U.S. Attorney’s Office regarding evidence in the Epstein case, providing a concrete lead (request for evidence, denial) and nam Attorney Bradley J. Edwards represented multiple alleged Epstein victims in mid‑2008. Edwards contacted AUSA Villafafia, who indicated a possible indictment despite alleged plea talks. The U.S. Attor

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

evidence-suppressionepsteinus-attorneys-officesexual-assaultevidence-withholdingfederal-prosecutionlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightvictim-representationvictim-advocacy
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney Edwards alleges U.S. Attorney's Office withheld evidence from Epstein abuse victims' counsel

The passage provides a concrete claim that federal prosecutors deliberately refused to share evidence collected in the Epstein search warrant with victim attorneys, suggesting possible obstruction or Edwards represented multiple alleged Epstein victims in mid‑2008. He contacted AUSA Villafafia, who indicated a possible indictment despite a purported plea deal. The U.S. Attorney’s Office refused t

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct in Federal Jeffrey Epstein Case

The passage alleges that senior U.S. Attorney Office staff (AUSA Weinstein, FAUSA Sloman, U.S. Attorney Acosta) disclosed case‑specific information and possibly offered financial inducements to witnes AUSA Weinstein allegedly disclosed plea‑negotiation details and warned a defense‑contact about media FAUSA Sloman reportedly sent non‑case‑specific information to defense, contradicting internal poli

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Federal prosecutors admit backing down on victim notifications in Jeffrey Epstein case after pressure from his attorneys

The passage reveals that U.S. Attorney’s Office officials altered victim‑notification procedures in 2013 due to objections from Epstein’s lawyers, suggesting possible prosecutorial misconduct and a co Federal prosecutors admitted in 2013 they altered victim‑notification obligations after pressure fro Former federal prosecutor Frances Hakes and Kenneth Staff are cited as having consulted with Epste

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alleged USAO Leaks and Victim Notification Scheme in Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement

The passage describes internal communications showing a U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO) allegedly coordinating victim‑notification letters, encouraging civil suits, and leaking confidential case details Nov 27‑28 2007 emails/letters show USAO staff (Sloman, Villafana) preparing victim‑notification lett Letter cites the “Justice for All Act of 2004,” later deemed inapplicable, and mischaracterizes Ep

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Former U.S. Attorney Assistant Hired by Epstein Allegedly Facilitated Minor Girls' Access to Epstein’s Mansion

The passage links a former federal prosecutor (Reinhart) to Epstein’s operation, cites specific depositions and an affidavit, and suggests obstruction of discovery. It provides concrete names, dates, Reinhart, former Assistant U.S. Attorney in Southern District of Florida, left the office and was hi Reinhart’s office was investigating Epstein criminally at the time of his departure. Depositions m

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Internal memo discusses federal prosecution strategy for Jeffrey Epstein and applicability of the petite policy

The document reveals that a U.S. Attorney's Office is evaluating whether to pursue federal charges against Jeffrey Epstein despite state proceedings, indicating potential high‑level prosecutorial deci Memo evaluates federal jurisdiction over commercial sexual exploitation of children in Epstein case. Discusses the 'petite policy' and its inapplicability due to overlapping state charges. Mentions t

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.