Court dismisses multiple defendants in SAAR Network terrorism financing lawsuits
Summary
The passage outlines procedural dismissals of claims that various organizations and individuals funded terrorist groups via the SAAR Network. It provides specific entity names, alleged money‑launderin Defendants include African Muslim Agency, Grove Corporate, Heritage Education Trust, International I Plaintiffs allege these entities were co‑conspirators, material sponsors, or aiders/abettors of th
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
MDL filings reveal Saudi banks and bin Laden family entities dismissed in 9/11 terrorism lawsuits
The document lists dozens of Saudi financial institutions and members of the bin Laden family as defendants in the September 11th multidistrict litigation, showing that plaintiffs alleged their suppor Seventy‑five defendants, including major Saudi banks and bin Laden family members, were part of a jo Plaintiffs seek to vacate dismissals of Al Rajhi Bank, SAMBA, DMI Trust, Saleh Abdullah Kamel, and
Plaintiffs seek damages over business reputation loss from defendants Tyler McDonald d/b/a Yi.Org
The filing is a routine civil suit seeking modest damages (>$15,000) for alleged reputational harm. It involves no high‑profile individuals, government agencies, or novel allegations, offering little Plaintiffs allege reputational damage caused by Tyler McDonald operating as Yi.Org. Requested relief includes damages exceeding $15,000 and a jury trial. Attorney for plaintiffs is Joe Titone, Florid
Ken Starr to handle appeal of billion‑dollar J&J verdict, cites “good friends on both sides”
The email suggests a former high‑profile attorney (Ken Starr) is personally involved in an appeal of a massive J&J jury verdict, hinting at possible insider connections (“good friends on both sides”). Ken Starr indicates he will handle the appeal of a billion‑dollar J&J jury verdict. Mentions “good friends on both sides,” implying personal connections to plaintiffs and defendants. Email dated Dec
Court opinion on Alien Tort Statute claims related to alleged material support for al‑Qaeda
The passage is a legal brief discussing procedural arguments and statutory interpretation. It does not introduce new factual leads, names of individuals, financial transactions, or undisclosed actors. Plaintiffs allege defendants funded al‑Qaeda in Sudan during the early 1990s. District court dismissed ATS claims for lack of alleged hijacking‑specific allegations. The brief argues ATS covers broad
Saudi princes and SAAR network entities named in 9/11 multidistrict litigation motions
The document lists high‑profile Saudi officials (Prince Salman and Prince Naif) and a network of charities and investment firms (SAAR network) as defendants in lawsuits alleging support for the Septem Prince Salman and Prince Naif filed motions to dismiss 9/11 liability claims under FSIA. Defendants include Saudi‑linked charities and investment entities (SAAR network). Multiple motions to dismiss
Appeal urges court to allow jurisdictional discovery into Saudi-linked sovereign defendants in 9/11 litigation
The passage indicates plaintiffs are seeking discovery to determine whether NCB (National Commercial Bank) and other defendants are instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which could expose f Plaintiffs argue NCB is an instrumentality of Saudi Arabia and request jurisdictional discovery. The appeal seeks reversal of dismissals of sovereign defendants under FSIA. Approximately 20 defendant
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.