Skip to main content
Skip to content
Epstein email praising a young sustainability expert who allegedly influenced P&G practicesRitz-Carlton Club Update on Hurricane Irma Damage and Relief Efforts in St. Thomas
Case File
d-23195House OversightFinancial Record

Document request seeks evidence that President Clinton never set foot on Jeffrey Epstein’s island

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #014104
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals a litigant is attempting to obtain documents that could confirm or refute a claim about a former president’s presence on Epstein’s island, linking a high‑profile political figure t Defendant is asked to produce documents supporting the claim that President Clinton never visited Li The request references a sworn declaration by Alan M. Dershowitz citing Secret Service records. De

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Jeffrey Epstein

“...11. | Copies of any and all documents tending to establish that President Clinton has never visited Jeffrey Epstein’s island, Little Saint James, as described in paragraph 8 of the sworn Declaration of Alan M. Dersh...”

Tags

secret-servicejeffrey-epsteinfinancial-flowdocument-productionforeign-influencelegal-filinglegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightreputational-riskclinton
Browse House Oversight Committee ReleasesHouse Oversight #014104
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 319-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2015 Page 21 of 34 RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Document Request to the extent that Plaintiffs seek to alter or shift any burdens of proof as a matter of law in this action. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing specific objections and General Objections, Defendant responds that he will produce all responsive, non-privileged documents currently in his possession, custody or control. 10. | Copies of any and all documents supporting the allegation that “Jane Doe #3 is a serial liar” as described in paragraph 8 of the sworn Declaration of Alan M. Dershowitz. RESPONSE: Subject to and without waiving the General Objections, Defendant responds that he will produce all responsive, non-privileged documents currently in his possession, custody or control. 11. | Copies of any and all documents tending to establish that President Clinton has never visited Jeffrey Epstein’s island, Little Saint James, as described in paragraph 8 of the sworn Declaration of Alan M. Dershowitz. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Document Request because it misstates paragraph 8 of the sworn Declaration of Alan M. Dershowitz, which expressly states that “on information and belief, | have been advised that Secret Service records would confirm that President Clinton has never set foot on that island.” (Emphasis added). Subject to and without waiving the foregoing specific objections and the General Objections, Defendant responds that he has no responsive, non- privileged documents.

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

DonateMore ways to support →
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.