House Republican Tax Reform Blueprint vs. Trump Campaign Tax Plan Overview

Tax The surprising results of yesterday’s election have teed up comprehensive tax reform asa clear priority for the new Republican President and the Republican Congress. A unified Republican government makes the process of achieving significant tax reform much more manageable next year, in particular because Speaker Ryan during the campaign pledged to move such a plan in the form of so- called budget reconciliation legislation, which would mean that only a simple majority of senators would be necessary to pass the plan, rather than the usual 60-vote majority. Alot of the groundwork has been laid through proposals and negotiationsover the last three or four years on various key aspects of businesstax reform, but Congressional Republican leaders and the new President will have to decide whether to push forward with legislation that embodies the House Republican Tax Reform Blueprint, or the outlines of atax reform plan that President-elect Trump championed during the campaign. One significant difference is that the Blueprint, according to its authors, is largely revenue neutral using dynamic scoring, while the Trump plan was scored by various non- governmental groups as losing trillions of dollars. House Speaker Ryan has said on multiple occasions that tax reform is his top priority. The Blueprint, the sixth and final plank of Ryan’s “Better Way” campaign to provide policy alternatives, proposed a 20%statutory corporate tax rate, a 25%businesstax rate for pass-through entities, a move toward a cash-flow consumption tax through immediate expensing for all businesses and elimination of deductibility of net interest expense, a territorial international tax system, a border tax adjustment mechanism, and elimination of most business preferences except the R&D tax credit and LIFO. Interestingly, all of these pieces of businesstax reform may be fair game in discussions with Democrats, but the two parties differ greatly over whether to reduce individual tax rates —a key component of both the Blueprint and the Trump campaign agenda —and over important revenue issues, including whether reform should be revenue neutral on a static basis, and whether timing and one-timerevenue raisers should be used to pay for permanent tax rate reduction. The use of budget reconciliation, however, could make many of these differencesirrelevant as Senate Democrats could have little power to change or block the legislation on the Senate floor. Along with the 20%statutory corporate tax rate, the Blueprint includes a 25 %business tax rate for pass- through entities; and individual rates set at 12% 25% and 33% Ways and Means Republican tax staff is in the process of receiving feedback and building out the tax reform Blueprint by drafting detailed statutory language. The publicly expressed goal isto have that effort completed by the end of 2016. In October 14 remarks at University of Wisconsin-Madison, House Speaker Ryan said, “| really want to get tax reform running as quickly as possible..: Asked September 29 whether there is opportunity for progress on big-ticket itemsin 2017, Senate Majority Leader McConnell said, “We need to do tax-reform — comprehensive tax-reform —not piecemeal.” Trump's tax plan differs from the Blueprint in that the corporate tax rate would be lower —15%-—with the same rate imposed on pass through entities. The latest statement from the Trump campaign suggests that small business owners do not retain earnings may face double taxation. Individual income tax rates would be 12% 25% and 33% the same as the House Republican tax reform Blueprint. Trump and his staff have supported a 10%tax rate on the deemed repatriation of previously untaxed foreign earnings of US companies, but the campaign never made clear whether they still support repeal of deferral ina new international tax system going forward. Trump has pledged to work with House Republicans on tax issues and, in addition to adopting their proposed individual rates, brought his plan closer to theirs by announcing support for immediate expensing of new business investments for manufacturers. The House plan proposed expensing in conjunction with eliminating the deductibility of net interest expense. In the follow-up toa September 15 speech to the Economic Club of New York, Trump clarified that he believes expensing should be limited to manufacturers and those who elect expensing will lose the deductibility of corporate interest expense. The Trump campaign also clarified in September that they favored repeal of most corporate tax expenditures, except for the R&D Credit. While continuing to call for repeal of the estate tax, Trump proposed disallowing a step-up in basis for estates over $10 million: “The Trump plan will repeal the death tax, but capital gains held until death will be subject to tax, with the first $10 million tax- free as under current law to exempt small businesses and family farms. To prevent abuse, contributions of appreciated assets into a private charity established by the decedent or the decedent’s relatives will be disallowed.” EY 13 | Election 2016 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022385