Skip to content
Case File
d-23282House OversightOther

Bannon’s warnings about prosecutors and internal White House dynamics after Paris Agreement withdrawal

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #020064
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The passage offers vague commentary on internal power struggles, mentions several high‑profile figures, but provides no concrete evidence, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It hints at legal r President withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement, prompting resignations from Elon Musk and Bob I Steve Bannon warned staff to avoid speaking with Jared and Ivanka Trump, labeling them 'Russia tox

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

mueller-investigationwhite-house-staffpolitical-influencepolitical-strategyparis-agreementlegal-exposurehouse-oversightlegal-risk
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bannon’s alleged campaign to sabotage Trump health‑care bill and target Kushner, Cohn, Priebus, Price, and Ryan

The passage offers vague, unverified assertions about Steve Bannon coordinating a political sabotage effort against senior White House officials. It lacks concrete evidence, dates, transactions, or ac Bannon allegedly urged reporters to focus on Jared Kushner during the Russia investigation. Claims Bannon targeted Kushner, Gary Cohn, Reince Priebus, Mick Mulvaney (referred to as "Price"), a Allege

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Bannon–Epstein emails discuss Saudi‑linked funding, think‑tank financing and covert political coalition building

The exchange directly links Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein to discussions about securing money for a think‑tank, political ads, and a ‘coin’ funding mechanism, mentions a Saudi connection, and refer Bannon and Epstein coordinate on raising money for a think‑tank, ads, and policy meetings. Reference to a Saudi‑linked individual ('Jide') to be read into Saudi, suggesting foreign influence. Discuss

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Michael Wolff emails Jeffrey Epstein about coordinating a Trump‑Bannon interview and political strategy

The passage reveals a direct communication between journalist Michael Wolff and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein discussing a potential media piece featuring Steve Bannon and Donald Trump. It su Wolff proposes a joint interview with Epstein and Steve Bannon about Trump. Reference to a meeting with Bannon scheduled for November 6‑8, 2018. Wolff frames Epstein as a “former friend of Trump, adv

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bannon‑Trump dynamics described in internal White House commentary

The passage offers only vague internal observations about Steve Bannon’s influence on President Trump and internal White House attitudes. It lacks concrete names of transactions, dates, or actionable Describes Bannon as a ‘revolutionary’ figure within the Trump administration. Notes internal White House dismissiveness toward Bannon (“Steve is … Steve”). Suggests a split between ‘Bannon‑Trump’ and

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bannon portrayed as international populist movement architect with vague blockchain references

The passage offers only rhetorical descriptions of Steve Bannon’s influence and ambitions, lacking concrete names, dates, financial transactions, or actionable leads. It repeats generic claims about h Claims Bannon is encouraging a trans‑national right‑wing movement. Mentions Bannon’s interest in blockchain and cryptocurrency as political tools. Alleged establishment of a “European headquarters” i

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email chain linking Steve Bannon and a source to Alex Acosta's handling of Jeffrey Epstein case

The passage cites a forwarded email from an unnamed source (Robert Grusky) to Steve Bannon discussing Acosta's alleged lenient plea deal for Epstein and a civil lawsuit buyout. It identifies high‑prof Steve Bannon received an email about Acosta’s role in Epstein’s plea bargain. Claims that Epstein bought out a civil suit that would have allowed victims to testify. Allegation that Acosta’s lenient

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.