Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-23313House OversightOther

Email exchange between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss discussing secular dogma and academic discourse

The passage contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or references to powerful officials or agencies. It is a routine academic correspondence with no actionable investigative leads. Exchange of opinions on secular versus religious dogma. Mentions of 'American exceptionalism', Israeli self‑defense, and Obama. No references to specific wrongdoing, financial flows, or legal matters.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #025637
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or references to powerful officials or agencies. It is a routine academic correspondence with no actionable investigative leads. Exchange of opinions on secular versus religious dogma. Mentions of 'American exceptionalism', Israeli self‑defense, and Obama. No references to specific wrongdoing, financial flows, or legal matters.

Tags

academic-discoursepolitical-commentarysecularismhouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Noam Chomsky <_gP wrote: Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total. On confronting dogma, | of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. — are much more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics find dismantling myths of “American exceptionalism” or “Israeli self-defense” or Obama’s mass murder campaign, etc., offensive — so be it. But | don’t see why that should extend to ridicule. That includes astrologists. Astronomers can refute astrology, while recognizing that perfectly honest and deluded people may believe it and should be treated with respect, while their beliefs are confronted with evidence. | also don’t see why we should ridicule religious dogma, just as | don’t think we should ridicule the much more pernicious secular dogmas. Rather, we should respond to irrational belief with argument and evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secular dogma) are people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometimes. For example, when the icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs informs us that the US, unlike other countries, has a “transcendental purpose,” and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to its purpose doesn’t matter because the facts are just “abuse of history” while real history is “the evidence of history as our minds reflect it,” then it’s hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There’s no point ridiculing virtually the entire IR profession and the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major human disasters. On Davis, | frankly think that’s a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment require (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case. Noam From: Lawrence Krauss [mailto i | Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM To: Noam Chomsky qa jeffrey £. <[email protected]> Subject: an article you may both hate. or like. hope all is well. Lawrence http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists Lawrence M. Krauss Director, The Origins Project at ASU Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative Foundation Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research office: BD ssistant Uessica)

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone287-1404
URLhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Chomsky–Krauss email discussing secular dogma and academic attitudes

The passage contains only a personal email exchange with philosophical commentary and no concrete allegations, transactions, or actionable leads involving powerful actors. It mentions no specific misc Email exchange between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss dated September 2015. Discussion of secular dogma, American exceptionalism, and academic discourse. Reference to a New Yorker article about sci

1p
House OversightUnknown

Email chain discussing religion, fanaticism, and academic opinions – no substantive lead

Email chain discussing religion, fanaticism, and academic opinions – no substantive lead The passage consists of informal email exchanges between private individuals (including Lawrence Krauss and Noam Chomsky) about philosophical views on religion and secular dogma. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, dates, or connections to powerful officials or agencies, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Informal discussion of religion and fanaticism.; Mentions of public intellectuals (Krauss, Chomsky) but no claims of wrongdoing.; No references to government bodies, financial flows, or illegal activity.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Casual email chain between Lawrence Krauss and a contact mentioning Caribbean trips and island ownership

Casual email chain between Lawrence Krauss and a contact mentioning Caribbean trips and island ownership The passage contains informal personal correspondence with no concrete allegations, financial details, or links to powerful officials. It merely references a possible visit by Johnny Depp and an island in the Bahamas, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Lawrence Krauss mentions a contact who owns an island in the Bahamas.; Suggestion to invite Johnny Depp to a Caribbean visit.; Repeated confidentiality notices that appear boilerplate.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email exchange between Lawrence Krauss, Noam Chomsky, and a private individual discussing secular vs religious dogma

The document contains a casual academic discussion with no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or links to powerful officials or agencies. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confir Krauss and Chomsky exchange views on religion, secular dogma, and academic discourse. Reference to a New Yorker article about militant atheism. No substantive claims about misconduct, financial flows

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Casual email chain about Caribbean trips, islands, and philosophical musings

The document consists of informal correspondence between academics discussing personal travel plans and philosophical opinions. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or links to Mentions a private island in the Bahamas owned by an unnamed individual. References a potential visit by Johnny Depp (implied) to the Caribbean. Includes philosophical commentary from Noam Chomsky on

3p
House OversightUnknown

Email exchange between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss discussing secular dogma and academic discourse

Email exchange between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss discussing secular dogma and academic discourse The passage contains a routine academic correspondence with no concrete allegations, financial details, or links to powerful officials or controversial actions. It lacks actionable leads, novelty, or sensitivity. Key insights: Conversation between Noam Chomsky and Lawrence Krauss dated September 2015.; Discussion focuses on secular dogma, American exceptionalism, and academic freedom.; No mention of specific wrongdoing, financial transactions, or policy decisions.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.