Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-23420House OversightOther

Dershowitz seeks to strike allegations in Epstein case, claims false accusations

The passage mainly repeats courtroom arguments that Alan Dershowitz is being falsely accused in the Epstein litigation. It provides no new factual leads, specific transactions, dates, or evidence link Dershowitz is listed in an address book seized from Epstein’s butler. His name is circled by an unknown party, prompting speculation of abuse. Flight logs show Dershowitz and Jane Doe #3 were on Epst

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #010737
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage mainly repeats courtroom arguments that Alan Dershowitz is being falsely accused in the Epstein litigation. It provides no new factual leads, specific transactions, dates, or evidence link Dershowitz is listed in an address book seized from Epstein’s butler. His name is circled by an unknown party, prompting speculation of abuse. Flight logs show Dershowitz and Jane Doe #3 were on Epst

Tags

court-documentsdefamationlegal-filingalan-dershowitzlegal-exposurehouse-oversightepstein

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 306 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/02/2015 Page 3 of 19 At bottom, Jane Doe #3’s Response is nothing but a paper-thin pastiche of conspiracy theory and outright misrepresentation that crumbles upon examination. Invocations of the Fifth Amendment by nonparty witnesses in response to innocuous questions about Prof. Dershowitz are said to take on a “sinister cast”; yet these same witnesses invoked their right against self- incrimination to almost every question asked of them, including their parents’ names. Prof. Dershowitz, as Epstein’s former legal counsel, is one of hundreds of people listed in an address book purloined by Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal butler; yet because Prof. Dershowitz’s name is circled in the address book by an unknown person for unknown reasons, the argument is made that Prof. Dershowitz must have sexually abused a minor. The record shows that while Prof. Dershowitz and Jane Doe #3 are both separately mentioned in the flight logs of Mr. Epstein’s private plane, they are never listed on the same flight. Plaintiffs, in turn, falsely claim that somehow Prof. Dershowitz single-handedly orchestrated the destruction of logs without any evidence of ability or possibility to do so. The increasingly unfounded accusations and insults are both sad and irresponsible. It is precisely this toxic mix of irrelevancy, malicious falsehood, and empty accusation that justifies Prof. Dershowitz’s intervention to, at least, strike the allegations against him. Jane Doe #3 never had any need to drag Prof. Dershowitz into this action besides to wrongfully use his good name and international stature to stir up media interest in her filing. This is impertinence, plain and simple, and it has no place in this Court. Prof. Dershowitz therefore urges the Court to either allow him to intervene to strike Jane Doe #3’s defamatory allegations or deny Jane Doe #3’s Joinder Motion so she is no longer afforded the ability to use the docket of this Court to defame others without being held accountable and strike these allegations from the record.

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Concrete Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Misconduct

The document largely recaps existing reporting and court‑record reviews, noting that no hard evidence directly ties former President Bill Clinton to criminal activity by Jeffrey Epstein. It does highl Clinton appears on 13 documented flights on Epstein's private jet, often accompanied by Epstein aide Attorney Jack Scarola warned of “extortionate threats, power, wealth or political pressure” when a

10p
House OversightMay 25, 2017

Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017)

Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell – Oral Argument Docket (Southern District of New York, March 31, 2017) The document is a routine court docket listing parties, counsel, and judge for an oral argument. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to powerful actors beyond the already public parties. As such, it offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Case number: 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS); Judge: Hon. Robert W. Sweet; Plaintiff: Virginia L. Giuffre

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
House OversightUnknown

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Hard Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Crimes, but Flight Logs and Lawyer Claims Provide Leads

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Hard Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Crimes, but Flight Logs and Lawyer Claims Provide Leads The passage summarizes a detailed review of over 2,000 pages of court filings that confirm Bill Clinton flew on Epstein's jet multiple times and that attorneys have attempted to use Clinton's connection in lawsuits. While it concludes there is no concrete proof of sexual misconduct, it identifies specific leads – flight logs, attorney Jack Scarola’s threats, alleged settlement negotiations involving Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr, and pending lawsuits by [REDACTED - Survivor] – that merit further investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Clinton appears on 13 flight logs for Epstein's private 727 between 2002‑2003, often with Epstein aide Sarah Kellen and Clinton aide Doug Band.; Attorney Jack Scarola warned of "extortionate threats, power, wealth or political pressure" when asked for proof linking Clinton.; [REDACTED - Survivor]' lawsuit alleges Epstein forced her sexual exploitation by "adult male peers" including high‑level figures; she claims Clinton was present on Little St. James Island but later recanted sexual claims against him.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
House OversightApr 9, 2019

Empty Exhibit 8 Submission (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017771)

Empty Exhibit 8 Submission (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017771) The document contains only a title and exhibit label with no substantive content, providing no leads, names, dates, or allegations to investigate. Key insights: Document consists solely of an exhibit heading and identifier.; No information on persons, transactions, or events is present.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.