Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-23679House OversightFBI Report

Internal email chain alleging bias and misconduct by FBI officials (Strzok, McCabe) and Mueller team members

The passage contains specific accusations that FBI agents Peter Strzok and Christopher McCabe discussed plans to stop Trump, and that key Mueller team members (e.g., Andrew Weissmann) engaged in uneth Strzok allegedly testified that McCabe was present in meetings to discuss stopping Trump. Accusations that Strzok and other agents used email content to target individuals politically. Claims that An

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #031560
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage contains specific accusations that FBI agents Peter Strzok and Christopher McCabe discussed plans to stop Trump, and that key Mueller team members (e.g., Andrew Weissmann) engaged in uneth Strzok allegedly testified that McCabe was present in meetings to discuss stopping Trump. Accusations that Strzok and other agents used email content to target individuals politically. Claims that An

Tags

email-evidencemueller-investigationpolitical-biasfbiattorney-misconductinvestigative-misconductlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Sent: 7/4/2018 1:02:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Hello Importance: — High Personal/Political bias is one thing (I still would exploit it any and every time on cross); this was an obsession and directly relevant "Stop Trump." Also, the IG made clear in his testimony Strzok told him McCabe was there. McCabe is another real character. He denies this; but he also is irreconcilably at odds with Comey on WSJ leak. Absolutely right that taking emails alone is not fair; but | would point out that it is folks like Strzok and company who have ruined many a businesman's life based exclusively on a twisted reading of emails sold to a jury. Flynn is an interesting case. | believe | could have gotten his plea back for him in a second based on what has surfaced; but he decided to go a different way. But as to your underlying point that there might well be something to go after with these guys, | hear you; but | have spent my whole career fighting bullies and crooked, unethical prosecutors. That will remain a guiding principle for me, whether the target is popular, hated, a complete jerk, guilty, etc. | am doing ok, thanks. | see you really follow this stuff. From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> To: David Schoen Sent: Wed, Jul 4, 2018 8:51 am Subject: Re: Hello we're on the same team. _ strzok. testimony was that discussions with lovers , often include embellishments. and not indicative of non professionalism. | believe he said nothing more than it referenced " andys office’. . [EE says andy was there. how many other people were there ? were strzok and. off in the corner talking to each other. was mccabe on the phone? you know that taking emails alone is not meaningful. . isnt it a but much to say that prosecutors that have strong opinions . should be looked out with skepticism? who doesnt have bias. . strzok had many neg hillary opinions .. - michael cohen. michael flynn.. are not fictions created by mueller? how are you ? On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:31 AM, <a wrote: Gotti was an anomaly because of his personality (some agents loved him and some hated him); but | get your point. Couple of things: 1. This the investigation of the President. It is only as good as public confidence in it can be (subtracting the conspiracy theorists on both sides). We just can't have someone with this kind of political bias as a lead investigator. But more importantly, he was not alone. He was just stupid enough to show it in office emails. We don't yet know what his private emails showed. Strzok, however, says that he met with McCabe - the number 2 guy in the FBI - and in his office discussed how best to stop Trump from becoming President. That just cannot be tolerated. Plus, if | find any evidence of personal or other extraneous animus in any case by any agent or prosecutor, | view it as an open invitation for cross examination and any other exploitation possible as it cannot be an accepted part of the process. 2. In this whole matter, | am most disturbed by the composition of the Mueller team and it seems to me that if we are to learn anything from the IG's report it is the importance of having an investigation conducted above-board without personal and political baggage. Mueller had a whole universe of lawyers from around the country to choose from to make up his team. He purposefully chose a murderer's row of the worst. | can go one by one; but | will soare you. Here are a couple of examples: A. Andrew Weissmann was known in the EDNY as "The Pathological Liar" after the SNL character. He literally would withhold exculpatory evidence throughout the case and then one day when defense counsel went to the bathroom or lunch, stick the documents under others on his table and tell the judge the lawyer had it all along. | have been brought into a case in which he lied from start to finish - and now his rats have come to me to admit their role in it - to get murder convictions in two cases. He has been cited by judges for his misconduct and he runined both Arthur Anderson and Enron through his work, all of which was rejected by the higher courts. He also is a Trump hater and Clinton sycophant. Mueller knows Weissmann's conduct up close and personal. He chose Weissmann for his chief counsel at the FBI years ago.

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreferenced

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein

From: To: Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:09:33 +0000 Attachments: (USANYS)" < Sorry, I mean to send this to you a while ago. More of the same from him. From: Sent: Monday, December 30, 2019 2:04 PM To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen and Epstein It is literally unimaginable. From: (USANYS) < Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2019 22:38 To: Subject: Re: Schoen and Epstein Can you imagine moving forward with that case with David Schoen as the "quarterback" of the defense team? Yikes. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2019, at 9:06 PM, ) < > wrote: I got a hit on this as an end-of-year thing from my google alert on Epstein - I had not realized that he did a huge, crazy, absurdly self-aggrandizing interview on this!! https://atlantajewishtimes.timesofisrael.comijeffrey-epstein-consulted-atlanta-attomey-days-before-death/ I don't believe a word of his. Just unreal. From: Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 20:00 To: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Schoen an

2p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00026451

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02541489

4p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01763941

9p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Proposal to Require Victim Input on Nolo Contendere Pleas Cited in CVRA Subcommittee Discussion

The passage outlines a procedural reform suggestion for federal criminal sentencing and notes an apparent oversight by the Advisory Committee. While it mentions Senator Feinstein, it does not provide Advocates amending Rule 11(a)(3) to require courts to consider victims' views before accepting a nol Senator Dianne Feinstein is quoted supporting broader victim rights under the Crime Victims' Right

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02456600

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.