The witness, Conrad, is being questioned about her husband's criminal history, which she allegedly c...
Summary
The witness, Conrad, is being questioned about her husband's criminal history, which she allegedly concealed during voir dire. She is also questioned about her father's employment with the Justice Department and her own involvement in a disciplinary proceeding, which she failed to disclose.
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The deposition transcript shows a tense exchange between the witness, G Maxwell, and the attorney co...
The deposition transcript shows a tense exchange between the witness, G Maxwell, and the attorney conducting the deposition, with the witness refusing to answer certain questions and the attorney warning of potential consequences. The witness's attorney intervenes, objecting to the tone and potential threats made by the opposing attorney.
The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respond...
The witness testifies about representing Craig Brubaker, recalls a juror's note asking about respondeat superior, and discusses a conversation with Susan Brune about the juror.
The witness discusses their reaction to receiving a letter from a juror, which they found disturbing...
The witness discusses their reaction to receiving a letter from a juror, which they found disturbing due to its tone and content. They mention discussing the letter with their partner Randy Kim and connecting it to information previously shared by Theresa Trzaskoma.
The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questi...
The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questions about the disclosure of information regarding Juror No. 1 and whether the law firm would have disclosed it without the court's inquiry or the government's action. The witness responds that they thought it would come out at some point during the proceedings.
The witness agrees that omissions can be considered lies and testifies about Theresa Trzaskoma's par...
The witness agrees that omissions can be considered lies and testifies about Theresa Trzaskoma's participation in a phone call with the Court. The witness did not discuss the call with Trzaskoma beforehand and is unsure if anyone else did. The testimony highlights potential issues with the firm's communication and candor.
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of certain facts and the drafting of a legal b...
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of certain facts and the drafting of a legal brief. They discuss their understanding of events and the reasoning behind the wording used in the brief. The testimony highlights potential discrepancies in interpretation and the context in which the brief was written.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.