Discovery Dispute Over Alan Dershowitz's Document Control in Defamation Suit
Summary
The passage outlines a procedural battle over production of documents and metadata in a defamation case involving Alan Dershowitz. While it flags potential evidence that could expose communications or Plaintiffs allege Dershowitz is withholding documents and metadata under the claim of ‘control’. The objection is framed as ‘word play’ and gamesmanship, suggesting possible intentional concealment D
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Court filing disputes joinder of Jane Doe #3's allegations against Prof. Alan Dershowitz
The passage merely outlines procedural arguments over whether a plaintiff’s allegations should be joined to an existing case and references unverified claims of sexual misconduct. It provides no concr Defendant (Prof. Dershowitz) seeks to strike alleged false allegations or to intervene if joinder is Jane Doe #3 is accused of fabricating claims with a “financial motive” after a seven‑year delay. T
Court hearing references alleged accusations involving world leaders and Alan Dershowitz in a sexual‑abuse case
The passage hints at a claim that a plaintiff’s statement links high‑profile figures (unspecified world leaders and Alan Dershowitz) to alleged wrongdoing, suggesting a possible foreign‑influence or e Plaintiff’s statement reportedly mentions "world leaders" and Alan Dershowitz as part of alleged lie Defense counsel argues the plaintiff would lose if she cannot prove Maxwell’s role. The court appe
Certificate of Service listing counsel for Dershowitz and plaintiffs
The document only provides a service certificate with email addresses and law firm contacts. It contains no substantive allegations, financial details, or actions linking powerful actors to misconduct Date of service: April 9, 2015 Counsel for defendant Alan Dershowitz listed (Sigrid S. McCawley, Thomas E. Scott, Steven R. Safra) Counsel for plaintiffs listed (Jack Scarola, SEARCY DENNEY SCAROLA B
Defendant Dershowitz provides evasive, incomplete interrogatory answers in defamation suit linked to Jeffrey Epstein
The passage highlights potential obstruction of discovery in a defamation case involving Alan Dershowitz and references his personal relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. While it points to possible conc Defendant repeatedly gives vague or evasive answers to plaintiff's interrogatories. References to a personal relationship between Dershowitz and Jeffrey Epstein. Plaintiffs allege defamation by Dersh
Plaintiff seeks damages and defamation relief against Tyler McDonald and Yi.Org for alleged loss of business revenue
The filing outlines a civil claim for monetary damages and defamation against a private individual and his website. It provides no names of high‑profile officials, no financial flow details, and no no Plaintiff alleges loss of business revenue exceeding $15,000 due to actions of Tyler McDonald/Yi.Org Claims defamation: false statements published via the defendant’s domain hosting service. Plaintif
Email urging silence on Jeffrey Epstein allegations and suggesting contact with Alan Dershowitz
The passage references Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz in a vague advisory context, but provides no concrete details about transactions, dates, or specific wrongdoing. It hints at potential legal Sender advises the recipient to ignore Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer and instead seek Alan Dershowitz’s c Mentions possible investigations and reputational risk if allegations are not publicly denied. All
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.