Procedural appellate review of 9/11 terrorism support lawsuits
Summary
The document outlines jurisdictional and procedural issues in appellate review of existing 9/11 lawsuits, without revealing new allegations, financial flows, or specific powerful actors. It offers lim Plaintiffs allege material support to al‑Qaeda by five defendants under the Anti‑Terrorism Act. Multiple defendants were dismissed in prior district‑court orders (2005‑2010). Appeals were filed in Au
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Legal filing outlines pleading requirements for 9/11 survivors' lawsuits under RICO, TVPA, and Anti‑Terrorism statutes
The passage merely recites procedural standards and statutory elements for various causes of action (RICO, TVPA, ATA, New York tort claims) without naming specific defendants, financial transactions, Survivors' complaints alleged bank and charitable networks may have assisted al Qaeda but failed to TVPA claims were dismissed because plaintiffs did not allege actions by individuals under color of
Second Circuit Appeal Criticizes District Court’s Narrow Construction of ATA, ATS, and TVPA in 9/11 Terrorism Lawsuit
The passage is a judicial opinion discussing legal errors in a terrorism‑related civil case. It does not reveal new factual allegations, financial flows, or direct involvement of high‑level officials. Court narrowed the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and Terrorist Victims Protection Act (TVPA) improperly. Plaintiffs alleged material support to al‑Qaeda by defendants, but the district court required an o
Plaintiff’s Motion for Costs, Protection Order, and Jury Trial in Case 1:16‑cv‑04642
The passage is a routine pleading requesting attorney fees, a protection order, and a jury trial. It contains no substantive allegations, names of powerful actors, financial flows, or controversial ac Filed June 20, 2016 in SDNY case 1:16‑cv‑04642 Plaintiff seeks costs, attorney fees, and a protection order against unnamed defendants Requests a jury trial on all triable issues
Court docket entry for case Bradley J. Edwards v. Alan M. Dershowitz et al., includes videotaped deposition of Paul G. Cassel
The document is a basic docket listing with dates, locations, and parties involved. It provides no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑level officials, limiting its inve Case filed in Broward County Circuit Court (case no. CACE 15‑0). Plaintiffs: Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassel. Defendants include Alan M. Dershowitz and others.
Court opinion on Alien Tort Statute claims related to alleged material support for al‑Qaeda
The passage is a legal brief discussing procedural arguments and statutory interpretation. It does not introduce new factual leads, names of individuals, financial transactions, or undisclosed actors. Plaintiffs allege defendants funded al‑Qaeda in Sudan during the early 1990s. District court dismissed ATS claims for lack of alleged hijacking‑specific allegations. The brief argues ATS covers broad
Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in Virginia Giuffre defamation case
The passage reveals a motion to keep certain filings confidential that contain allegations of sexual abuse by a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, on behalf of Virginia Giuffre. While it identifi Defendants Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell filed a response to Dershowitz’s motion to keep re The contested records are three filings that recount Virginia Giuffre’s allegations of sexual abus
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.