Report flags Chinese state‑run media expansion in the U.S. and potential covert funding of pro‑PRC outlets
Summary
The passage identifies a systematic effort by the Chinese government to use U.S. broadcast and print platforms to disseminate Beijing‑aligned messaging, citing legal loopholes and alleged private‑sect Chinese state media are broadcasting in the U.S. via cable/satellite under relaxed ownership rules. Foreign ownership limits of the 1934 Communications Act have been effectively bypassed for cable ch
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Calls for FARA Registration of Chinese‑Backed U.S. Media Outlets
The passage outlines a policy proposal to require Chinese‑owned media companies and their staff to register under FARA and lobbying laws, suggesting a potential investigative angle on ownership struct Alleged Chinese government staffing of U.S. media outlets via China News Service. Asian Culture and Media Group listed as a private company but purportedly a front for propaganda. Calls for mandatory
Chinese State-Linked Media Outlets Operate Large U.S. Social Media Presence
The passage identifies specific Chinese government‑affiliated media entities (CCTV, CGTN, SinoVision, China Press, etc.) and quantifies their follower counts on major platforms, suggesting a coordinat Lists follower/subscriber numbers for Chinese state media on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram. Identifies the Overseas Chinese Affairs Office of the State Council as a controlling body for U.S.-
Bibliographic list on authoritarian historical revisionism in Russia and China
The document is a collection of published articles and media references without original evidence, new facts, or actionable leads. It merely cites existing reporting on Putin's historical narratives a Cites multiple sources describing Vladimir Putin defending the Nazi‑Soviet pact and rewriting Russia References Chinese government control over historical narratives and textbook content. Mentions Ru
Doe filing alleges Prince Andrew lobbying and confidentiality deals tied to Epstein case
The passage links Prince Andrew and high‑profile attorney Alan Dershowitz to alleged lobbying and confidential plea negotiations in the Epstein matter, suggesting possible foreign‑commerce implication Jane Doe #3 alleges Prince Andrew lobbied the U.S. government for a favorable plea arrangement for J Claims that confidentiality and "blank check" provisions were negotiated in connection with Prince
Petitioners claim U.S. government failed to consult victims before non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein
The filing alleges that the federal government negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein without informing the victims, suggesting possible misconduct by high‑level officials. It pro Petitioners invoke the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771). Allegation that the U.S. government negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstei Claim that victims were not c
Petitioners claim U.S. Government violated Crime Victims’ Rights Act by not consulting them before a non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein
The filing alleges that the Department of Justice negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein without victim input, suggesting possible misconduct or concealment at a high level. Petitioners invoke the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771). Allegation that the U.S. Government failed to consult victims before an NPA with Jeffrey Epstein. The case was filed in July 2008
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.