Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-25046House OversightOther

Victims allege U.S. Attorney’s Office kept Epstein non‑prosecution agreement secret and Ghislaine Maxwell was subpoenaed over alleged recruitment o...

The passage reveals a confidential non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) between the Justice Department and Jeffrey Epstein that was hidden from victims, suggesting possible misconduct by federal prosecutor U.S. Attorney’s Office and Epstein entered a confidential NPA that barred victims from learning abou Victims filed a Crime Victims’ Rights Act petition alleging denial of statutory rights. Virginia G

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015534
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals a confidential non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) between the Justice Department and Jeffrey Epstein that was hidden from victims, suggesting possible misconduct by federal prosecutor U.S. Attorney’s Office and Epstein entered a confidential NPA that barred victims from learning abou Victims filed a Crime Victims’ Rights Act petition alleging denial of statutory rights. Virginia G

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinsex-traffickingghislaine-maxwellnonprosecution-agreementcivil-litigationfinancial-flow-implied-by-npavictims-rights-violationsubpoenalegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightsexual-misconductvictims-rights

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 4 of 12 15. Rather than confer with the victims about the NPA, the U.S. Attorney’s Office and Epstein agreed to a “confidentiality” provision in the Agreement barring its disclosure to anyone—including Epstein’s victims. As a consequence, the victims were not told about the NPA. 16. On July 7, 2008, a young woman identified as Jane Doe No. 1, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims (other than Giuffre), filed a petition to enforce her rights under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, alleging that the Government failed to provide her the rights promised in the CVRA with regard to the plea arrangement with Epstein. The litigation remains ongoing. i On or about May 4, 2009, [REDACTED]—identified then as Jane Doe No. 102—filed a complaint against Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The complaint included allegations made by Giuffre that pertained to Maxwell. 18. In pertinent part, the Jane Doe No. 102 complaint described in detail how Maxwell recruited Giuffre (who was then a minor girl) to become a victim of sex trafficking by introducing Giuffre to Jeffrey Epstein. With the assistance of Maxwell, Epstein was able to sexually abuse Giuffre for years until Giuffre eventually escaped. 19. The Jane Doe No. 102 complaint contained the first public allegations made on behalf of Giuffre regarding Maxwell. 20. As civil litigation against Epstein moved forward on behalf of Giuffre and many other similarly-situated victims, Maxwell was served with a subpoena for deposition. Her testimony was sought concerning her personal knowledge and role in Epstein’s abuse of Giuffre and others.

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:15-CV-07433

Related Documents (6)

Financial RecordUnknown

Invoice Number: 4.013-86582

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01313161

9p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Epstein Reputation Management Email Reveals Paid SEO/Hacking Campaign to Suppress Negative Coverage

The email provides concrete details about a paid operation to manipulate search results for Jeffrey Epstein, including payments, specific tactics, and references to high‑profile associates. It suggest Epstein hired a contractor (Mike) for $2,500 plus a pending $7,500 to run SEO and hacking services. The operation involved removing negative articles, altering Wikipedia, replacing mug‑shot images, a

3p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]

GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01905212

5p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01838551

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01297934

"Darren Indyke" AND allegation OR arrest OR bribe OR convict OR corrupt OR court O... Page 1 of 2 Goggle *Clew IndyMC AND elligetton OR east OR bribe OR convict CR corrupt OR O All News 'arcs I,na9pn Maps Mtn - con /}n' ,y-. 12 resettle :0 2 roorde; Exclusive: New York attorney general seeks information on financier ... vAwr refort.CCWAIrtele2CISC0MtnagnIcinl.:^areynUSKBN0M2D0V2C15DXS Mos . North Korea Cnannes &Kew ror.ed Epstein's Lawyer Darren Indyke to cup*n why Easter(' foun

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.