Fragmented deposition transcript mentioning Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and a photograph ID 18-001
Summary
The excerpt is heavily redacted and incoherent, offering no concrete names of high‑profile officials, specific transactions, dates, or actionable details. It merely records a brief exchange about a ph Mentions individuals named Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger in a deposition context. Reference to a photograph labeled 18-001 and a subpoena served to the witness. Possible hint at a record‑keeping or
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Deposition excerpt showing contested attorney‑client privilege claims
The passage records a routine deposition dispute over privilege and mentions a lawyer (Jeffrey Herman) filing a lawsuit, but provides no concrete details about transactions, high‑level officials, or w Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of missing a hearing and obstructing the deposition. Reference to a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filing a lawsuit on the witness’s behalf. Debate over whether attorney‑cli
Fragmented House Oversight transcript mentions reimbursement by federal prosecutors
The excerpt provides a vague courtroom exchange with no concrete names, dates, or transaction details. It hints at a possible reimbursement from federal prosecutors but lacks specifics needed for acti Witness discusses not spending money and being at a location called "Marshall's" Reference to federal prosecutors informing the witness about a reimbursement Multiple objections by "Mr. Leopold" indi
Privileged Discussion Over Potential $50M Lawsuit Against Jeffrey Epstein
The excerpt hints at a lawsuit filed by an individual named Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein for $50 million, but provides no concrete details such as filing dates, co Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The discussion is framed as privileged, limiting disclosure of details. The witness and questioning attorney re
Witness refuses to confirm Leopold's $50M lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein citing privilege
The passage hints at a possible $50 million lawsuit filed by a Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein, but provides no names, dates, court docket numbers, or corroborating d Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The witness claims no knowledge of the lawsuit, invoking attorney‑client privilege. The questioning appears to
Deposition excerpts reference Jeffrey Epstein house staff, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz with vague admissions of visits and massages
The passage contains direct references to high‑profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein) and suggests that house staff testimony may exonerate an unnamed witness. While the Witness acknowledges being named in sworn testimony of Epstein’s house staff. References to Prince Andrew’s presence at the house and frequent visits by Alan Dershowitz. Claims of regular massages be
Deposition excerpt hints at alleged perjury by Virginia Roberts about Bill Clinton’s presence on Jeffrey Epstein’s island
The passage contains a claim that Virginia Roberts allegedly said Bill Clinton was with her on Epstein’s island and later recanted, plus an unverified allegation that Roberts has a criminal record for Witness is asked about a statement that Virginia Roberts claimed Bill Clinton was on Epstein’s islan The witness says Roberts later denied the claim and that she may have committed perjury. Allegatio
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.