Court denies Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene in Jane Does case (Case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM)
Summary
The passage merely records a routine procedural ruling denying a motion to intervene. It mentions Alan Dershowitz, a high‑profile attorney, but provides no concrete allegations, financial flows, or mi Judge denied Dershowitz's motion to intervene on March 24 2015. Dershowitz is accused of contradictory statements about possessing records. The filing lists attorneys for Jane Does No. 1‑4.
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Jane Doe victims contest Alan Dershowitz’s motion for limited intervention, alleging he hides truth about sexual molestation claims
The passage provides a concrete legal filing that references specific parties (Alan Dershowitz, multiple Jane Does) and a motion for limited intervention, suggesting a potential avenue for further dis Dershowitz filed a motion for limited intervention in a civil case (9:08‑80736‑Civ‑Marra/Johnson). He claims an affidavit from Jane Doe #3 disproves her allegations, but the filing says no evidence w
Jane Doe #3 seeks to block Alan Dershowitz's intervention in civil case
The passage merely outlines procedural arguments in a civil defamation suit and does not provide concrete leads about financial flows, wrongdoing, or high‑level actors. It mentions a well‑known academ Jane Doe #3 filed a motion for joinder and opposes Alan Dershowitz's request to intervene. The filing claims Dershowitz has no direct interest yet seeks to protect his reputation. Citations to prior
Dershowitz Counterclaim Cites Alleged Epstein‑Forced Sexual Relations with Minor Jane Doe #3
The passage links a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) and a notorious financier (Jeffrey Epstein) to alleged sexual abuse of a minor, providing a concrete legal filing that could be pursued for Dershowitz’s counterclaim references alleged sexual relations with a minor (Jane Doe #3) forced by E The alleged abuse allegedly occurred in multiple locations, including private planes and several s
Professor Alan Dershowitz seeks limited intervention in civil case, citing Fifth Amendment protections
The passage outlines a procedural filing by Dershowitz to intervene in a lawsuit and argues against adverse inferences from Fifth Amendment claims. It mentions no concrete financial flows, wrongdoing, Dershowitz files a motion for limited intervention to defend against alleged defamatory claims. The brief cites case law on adverse inference from Fifth Amendment assertions. If the court grants join
Court filing disputes joinder of Jane Doe #3's allegations against Prof. Alan Dershowitz
The passage merely outlines procedural arguments over whether a plaintiff’s allegations should be joined to an existing case and references unverified claims of sexual misconduct. It provides no concr Defendant (Prof. Dershowitz) seeks to strike alleged false allegations or to intervene if joinder is Jane Doe #3 is accused of fabricating claims with a “financial motive” after a seven‑year delay. T
Witness explains delayed court filing and lack of contact with Professor Alan Dershowitz
The passage provides a modest lead about a procedural delay in a 2015 filing and mentions a well‑known legal scholar, but it lacks concrete details on wrongdoing, financial flows, or high‑level offici Court record filed on Jan 21 2015 after months of delay by the U.S. Attorney's Office. Witness cites cost‑benefit analysis for not contacting Professor Alan Dershowitz before filing. Reference to a p
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.