Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-25488House OversightOther

Snowden’s motives for public appearance and interaction with journalists

The passage discusses Snowden’s strategic choices in revealing his identity and working with journalists, but offers no new actionable leads, specific transactions, or novel allegations involving high Snowden initially leaked documents anonymously to journalists in May 2013. He later met with journalists in person to gain a public profile. He allegedly chose documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras to

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #019769
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage discusses Snowden’s strategic choices in revealing his identity and working with journalists, but offers no new actionable leads, specific transactions, or novel allegations involving high Snowden initially leaked documents anonymously to journalists in May 2013. He later met with journalists in person to gain a public profile. He allegedly chose documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras to

Tags

public-relations-strategydocumentarypublicitywhistleblowinghouse-oversightnsajournalismmedia-coordination

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Snowden’s Choices | 281 need for him to expose himself in this way. If he merely wanted to be a whistle-blower, he could have, as Bradley Manning did, anony- mously sent the documents to journalists as “Citizen Four.” In fact, in late May 2013, that was exactly what he did. He anonymously sent Gellman the PRISM scoop, which the Post published on June 6. He also sent Greenwald and Poitras documents while he was still the anonymous Citizen Four. Neither Gellman nor Greenwald had suggested the need for a face-to-face meeting with Snowden. Even after he had revealed his true identity to Poitras and Greenwald on June 3, the Guardian editor Ewen MacAskill offered him the option of remaining an unnamed source for the stories. He said, as he later told Vanity Fair, “You should remain anonymous; the stories are just as good without you.” However, anonymity was not part of Snowden’s long game. The reason he gave Greenwald in Hong Kong for going public in this way was to avoid having any suspicion fall on his co-workers at the NSA. Yet in the initial stories published by Greenwald, Poitras, and Gellman, Snowden had not allowed the reporters to identify him © by either name or position. If he did not act to deflect suspicion from © his co-workers for the initial investigation, why do it a week later? In the intervening week, the FBI had already launched its criminal investigation. In any case, he did not need to be the subject of a docu- mentary film to take sole responsibility for stealing state secrets. He could have simply allowed Greenwald to identify him by name as the source in the stories. One thing that Snowden could not accomplish by anonymously transferring the documents to journalists was a starring role in the drama. If he had appeared digitally masked in Poitras’s video with an altered voice, he would not achieve fame. To do that, he needed to allow Poitras to film him committing the crime of turning over NSA documents to Greenwald. This video was also part of his advance planning. Indeed, one reason he chose Poitras was that she was a prizewinning documentary filmmaker. Snowden, while he was still working at the NSA in March 2013, made it clear how he intended to use Poitras’s filmmaking skills. He told her, “My personal desire is that you paint the target directly on my back.” Making himself the | | Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.indd 281 ® 9/30/16 8:13AM | |

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.