Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-25614House OversightOther

Memoir recounting personal involvement in Natan Sharansky's release

The passage is a personal narrative describing advocacy and media campaigns that led to Sharansky's release. It contains no new allegations, financial flows, or links to current powerful officials, an Describes a media campaign to humanize Anatoly (Sharansky) to pressure the Soviet Union. Mentions a prisoner exchange involving an East German spy and Sharansky. Claims the author worked pro bono for

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017292
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a personal narrative describing advocacy and media campaigns that led to Sharansky's release. It contains no new allegations, financial flows, or links to current powerful officials, an Describes a media campaign to humanize Anatoly (Sharansky) to pressure the Soviet Union. Mentions a prisoner exchange involving an East German spy and Sharansky. Claims the author worked pro bono for

Tags

cold-warforeign-influencemedia-campaignhuman-rightslegal-exposureprisoner-exchangehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
4.2.12 WC: 191694 We decided that the best way to keep him alive was to personalize him to the world. If the world got to know Anatoly as a human being, rather than merely as another prisoner of conscience, it would become more costly, in terms of international reactions, to the Soviet Union if he were to die in the Gulag. With this in mind, we set out to plaster his smiling face on every possible magazine cover, newspaper front page and television show. We enlisted his very beautiful, very photogenic, but very shy wife (Natasha, now Avital) in our campaign. Before long, his name became a household word and his image became familiar around the world. His wife’s pleas to release him in time to father their children fell on receptive ears—at least outside of the Soviet Union. At the same time, we filed legal briefs, lobbied for legislative action and convened academic conferences. Ultimately, after 9 years of unremitting efforts, we were able to arrange a prisoner exchange that resulted in the release of an East German spy, who I had been asked to represent in Boston, and Sharansky. Because Sharansky was not a spy, but a human rights activist, he refused to participate in a “spy swap.” The compromise we reached resulted in Sharanksy walking alone, and not as part of any exchange, across the Glienicke Bridge in Berlin, his book of Psalms in his hand. Sharanksy did get out in time to father two beautiful daughters, who I enjoy meeting every time I visit Natan and his wife in their home in Jerusalem. There, but for Grace of God and the luck of having grandparents and great grandparents with the foresight to leave Eastern Europe, go I. If Sharanksy’s grandparents had come to America and mine had remained in Europe, our roles could easily have been reversed. That’s why helping to save Sharansky’s life was the case with which I had the closest personal identification. It was also the case that required the widest array of weapons—law, politics, diplomacy, media, economics, persistence and luck—to win. Several years later, I was asked by a television talk show host, “In which case did you earn your biggest fee?” Without a moment’s hesitation, I replied, “Sharanksy.” The host was surprised. “I didn’t know Sharansky had any money,” he exclaimed. “He didn’t,” I replied. “I worked on his case without any fee or expenses for 9 years, but when I saw him walk across the Glienicke Bridge, my eyes filled with tears of joy, and when he whispered in my ear the Hebrew words “Baruch matir assumrim” (“Blessed are those who free the imprisoned”’), that was the biggest fee I will ever earn.” 205

Related Documents (6)

House OversightMar 11, 2011

Hollywood Oscar Campaign Narrative by Publicist Peggy Siegal

Hollywood Oscar Campaign Narrative by Publicist Peggy Siegal The passage is a promotional, anecdotal recount of Oscar season events and film festival screenings. It mentions industry figures (Harvey Weinstein, Scott Rudin, etc.) but provides no concrete allegations, financial details, or actionable leads linking them to misconduct or illicit activity. The content is largely descriptive and lacks novel, verifiable claims that would merit investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Peggy Siegal describes her role as a publicist covering Oscar campaigns.; Mentions various high‑profile filmmakers and actors (Harvey Weinstein, Scott Rudin, Tom Hooper, Colin Firth).; Describes festival strategies and award‑season lobbying tactics.

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01402237

NAME SEARCHED: Darren Indyke PWM BIS-RESEARCH performed due diligence research in accordance with the standards set by AML Compliance for your business We completed thorough searches on your subject name(s) in the required databases and have attached the search results under the correct heading below. Significant negative media results may require escalation to senior business, Legal and Compliance management. Also, all accounts involving PEPs must be escalated. Search: Result: RDC PC

79p
Dept. of JusticeAug 22, 2017

15 July 7 2016 - July 17 2016 working progress_Redacted.pdf

Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Irons, Janet < Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:47 AM Richard C. Smith     Hello Warden Smith,     mother is anxious to hear the results of your inquiry into her daughter's health.   I'd be grateful if you could  email or call me at your earliest convenience.  I'm free today after 2 p.m.  Alternatively, we could meet after the Prison  Board of Inspectors Meeting this coming Thursday.    Best wishes,    Janet Irons    1 Kristen M. Simkins From: Sent:

1196p
House OversightUnknown

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Hard Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Crimes, but Flight Logs and Lawyer Claims Provide Leads

BuzzFeed Review Finds Little Hard Evidence Linking Bill Clinton to Jeffrey Epstein Crimes, but Flight Logs and Lawyer Claims Provide Leads The passage summarizes a detailed review of over 2,000 pages of court filings that confirm Bill Clinton flew on Epstein's jet multiple times and that attorneys have attempted to use Clinton's connection in lawsuits. While it concludes there is no concrete proof of sexual misconduct, it identifies specific leads – flight logs, attorney Jack Scarola’s threats, alleged settlement negotiations involving Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr, and pending lawsuits by [REDACTED - Survivor] – that merit further investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Clinton appears on 13 flight logs for Epstein's private 727 between 2002‑2003, often with Epstein aide Sarah Kellen and Clinton aide Doug Band.; Attorney Jack Scarola warned of "extortionate threats, power, wealth or political pressure" when asked for proof linking Clinton.; [REDACTED - Survivor]' lawsuit alleges Epstein forced her sexual exploitation by "adult male peers" including high‑level figures; she claims Clinton was present on Little St. James Island but later recanted sexual claims against him.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Extensive speculative questioning of alleged meetings with global elites, politicians, and financiers

Extensive speculative questioning of alleged meetings with global elites, politicians, and financiers The passage lists a series of unverified, rhetorical questions about alleged interactions with high‑profile individuals (e.g., Qatar’s Sheikh, Australian PM, US officials, tech founders). While it mentions many powerful actors, it provides no concrete dates, documents, or transaction details, making it a low‑value lead that would require substantial corroboration before any investigative value can be assessed. Key insights: Alleged meeting with Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim of Qatar and possible discussion of World Cup bribery.; Reference to attorney Reid Weingarten and his defense of former CT governor John Rowland.; Mention of Brock Pierce and a bitcoin discussion, with possible involvement of Larry Summers.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Fragmentary Text Mentions ‘Cacioppo’, ‘Nusbaum’, and ‘Chicago Social Brain Network’ in Unclear Context

Fragmentary Text Mentions ‘Cacioppo’, ‘Nusbaum’, and ‘Chicago Social Brain Network’ in Unclear Context The passage consists largely of incoherent fragments with no clear factual allegations, dates, transactions, or identifiable misconduct. It only loosely references a few names (Cacioppo, Nusbaum) and an organization (Chicago Social Brain Network) without any substantive connection to wrongdoing or power structures, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Mentions a possible individual named Cacioppo.; Mentions a possible individual named Nusbaum.; References the Chicago Social Brain Network and a publication titled “Invisible Forces and Powerful Beliefs”.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.