Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-25614House OversightOther

Memoir recounting personal involvement in Natan Sharansky's release

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017292
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage is a personal narrative describing advocacy and media campaigns that led to Sharansky's release. It contains no new allegations, financial flows, or links to current powerful officials, an Describes a media campaign to humanize Anatoly (Sharansky) to pressure the Soviet Union. Mentions a prisoner exchange involving an East German spy and Sharansky. Claims the author worked pro bono for

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

cold-warforeign-influencemedia-campaignhuman-rightslegal-exposureprisoner-exchangehouse-oversight
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
4.2.12 WC: 191694 We decided that the best way to keep him alive was to personalize him to the world. If the world got to know Anatoly as a human being, rather than merely as another prisoner of conscience, it would become more costly, in terms of international reactions, to the Soviet Union if he were to die in the Gulag. With this in mind, we set out to plaster his smiling face on every possible magazine cover, newspaper front page and television show. We enlisted his very beautiful, very photogenic, but very shy wife (Natasha, now Avital) in our campaign. Before long, his name became a household word and his image became familiar around the world. His wife’s pleas to release him in time to father their children fell on receptive ears—at least outside of the Soviet Union. At the same time, we filed legal briefs, lobbied for legislative action and convened academic conferences. Ultimately, after 9 years of unremitting efforts, we were able to arrange a prisoner exchange that resulted in the release of an East German spy, who I had been asked to represent in Boston, and Sharansky. Because Sharansky was not a spy, but a human rights activist, he refused to participate in a “spy swap.” The compromise we reached resulted in Sharanksy walking alone, and not as part of any exchange, across the Glienicke Bridge in Berlin, his book of Psalms in his hand. Sharanksy did get out in time to father two beautiful daughters, who I enjoy meeting every time I visit Natan and his wife in their home in Jerusalem. There, but for Grace of God and the luck of having grandparents and great grandparents with the foresight to leave Eastern Europe, go I. If Sharanksy’s grandparents had come to America and mine had remained in Europe, our roles could easily have been reversed. That’s why helping to save Sharansky’s life was the case with which I had the closest personal identification. It was also the case that required the widest array of weapons—law, politics, diplomacy, media, economics, persistence and luck—to win. Several years later, I was asked by a television talk show host, “In which case did you earn your biggest fee?” Without a moment’s hesitation, I replied, “Sharanksy.” The host was surprised. “I didn’t know Sharansky had any money,” he exclaimed. “He didn’t,” I replied. “I worked on his case without any fee or expenses for 9 years, but when I saw him walk across the Glienicke Bridge, my eyes filled with tears of joy, and when he whispered in my ear the Hebrew words “Baruch matir assumrim” (“Blessed are those who free the imprisoned”’), that was the biggest fee I will ever earn.” 205

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bill Siegel email chain discussing 'The Control Factor' and anti‑Islamic conspiracy narrative

The passage is an internal email and interview transcript promoting a conspiratorial worldview about 'Islamic Enemy' and 'Civilization Jihad.' It mentions Jeffrey Epstein as a sender but provides no c Email originates from Jeffrey Epstein's address, but only contains a casual invitation and a link to Bill Siegel outlines a theory called the 'Control Factor' that frames Islam as a coordinated threa

20p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01355803

IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR THE AGENT(S): .When you accept the authority granted under this Authorization/Power of Attorney, a special legal relationship is created between you and the Principal. This relationship imposes on you legal responsibilities that continue until you resign or the Authorization/Power of Attorney is terminated or revoked. You must: 1. act according to any instructions from the Principal, or, where there are no instructions, in the Principal's best interest; 2. avoid c

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN RE:

IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN Non-Prosecution Agreement IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein with one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure expressed in this Agreement; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation of Epstein's background and offenses including; knowingly and willfully conspiring with others known and unknown to commit an offense against the United States, in violation of Titl

6p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Attachment A

Attachment A CERTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED PRESENCE BY REQUESTING LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY TO: Unit Chief Parole and Law Enforcement Programs Unit Homeland Security Investigations U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement FROM: FBI, New York Field Office RE: Request for Continued Presence for: SAC , of the FBI New York Field Office concur in this request and certify, in accordance with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)'s procedures for Continued Presence, that: 1. The justification and information concerning the request for Continued Presence are accurate and complete. 2. Documentation is attached certifying that the alien is a victim of a severe form of trafficking and may be a potential witness to that trafficking. 3. Name checks have been completed in the principle law enforcement databases on the person named in the request (National Crime Information Center and any other databases available) and, as appropriate, information from foreign law enforcement age

22p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

" aNIMIIM>

From: " aNIMIIM> To: a' alMIIM>, 11 Subject: RE: SDNY Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 5, 2019 issued to Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 13:55:48 +0000 I'm good with that. <MIMI.> Ori inal Messa e From: Sent: Thursday. August 1.2019 7:24 PM To: Subject: FW: SDNY Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 5, 2019 issued to I'd suggest a call for late Monday afternoon, if that works. Original Message From: Bloom, Suzanne Jaffe aa Sent: Thursday. August 1.2019 7:20 PM To: Cc: Hud ens, Johanna Rae Subject: Re: SDNY Grand Jury Subpoena Dated July 5, 2019 issued to Hi all. Thanks again for your time yesterday. Just checking in to see when you'd like to continue our conversation. Please let us know what would work best for you. Many thanks, Suzanne Suzanne Jaffe Bloom Partner Winston & Strawn LLP <x-apple-data-detectors://2/1><x-apple-data-detectors://4/1>200 Park Avenue<x-apple-data-detectors://0/1> New York, NY 10166-4193<x-apple-data-detectors://0/1> Bio<http://vvwvv.winston.comien

4p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01357352

From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: 1/21/2014 3: Edward Borlan1 Amanda Kirb Re: Case: 011 Reg E Dislcosure 01180757.pdf; pic26851.gif; pic15919.gie pic23576.gif; pic02726.gif Classification: Public Hi Amanda, my sincere apologies. I just reattached the correct disclosure in there. (See attached file: Reg E Dislcosure 01180757.pdf) Is it ok to you use the authorization time you put in dbforce? Thank you, Ted Borland (Embedded image moved to file: pic26851.gif) Ted Borland Assis

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.