Skip to content
Case File
d-257House OversightLegal Filing

The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, requested to modify a protective order to disclose certain documents to ...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-257
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, requested to modify a protective order to disclose certain documents to judicial officers in related civil cases. The court denied the request, finding that the defendant failed to establish good cause, but allowed limited disclosure of certain factual information under seal.

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

Request to modify a protective orderDisclosure of documents in related civil casesFair adjudication of issues in civil litigation
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court ordered the defendant detained pending trial, citing the risk of flight and rejecting alte...

The court ordered the defendant detained pending trial, citing the risk of flight and rejecting alternative measures such as electronic monitoring. The decision was based on factors including the nature of the crimes charged and the defendant's characteristics. The court's ruling was made in accordance with the Bail Reform Act.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document discusses the defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million bail package a...

The document discusses the defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million bail package and other conditions to address concerns regarding risk of flight. The court has inherent authority to reconsider its previous bail decision, and the defendant's new proposal aims to address the court's original concerns. The proposed conditions include a personal recognizance bond, home confinement with GPS monitoring, and restricted travel.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document discusses the defendant's renewed motion for bail, analyzing the burden of production a...

The document discusses the defendant's renewed motion for bail, analyzing the burden of production and the presumption of flight. The court considers various factors, including the defendant's financial conditions and family ties, in determining whether they pose a flight risk. Ultimately, the court weighs the presumption of flight against the defendant's rebuttal evidence.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court denies the Defendant's renewed motion for release on bail, citing serious charges, strong ...

The court denies the Defendant's renewed motion for release on bail, citing serious charges, strong evidence, and the Defendant's substantial resources and foreign ties as reasons to believe she is a flight risk. The Defendant had presented new information, including evidence of family ties, a detailed financial report, and waivers of her right to contest extradition, but the court found it insufficient to overcome the presumption against release.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on September 2, 2020, allows the Defendant to make...

The court order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on September 2, 2020, allows the Defendant to make unsealing applications to other Courts if desired. The order is related to Case 1203660083804. The judge has signed off on the order, indicating that the Defendant has the liberty to pursue unsealing in relevant jurisdictions.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant...

The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant poses a significant flight risk and that the government's case remains strong despite the defendant's pretrial motions. The court should deny the defendant's motion for bail due to the risk of flight and lack of new information.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.