Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-26062House OversightOther

Opinion piece on education standards and political elite schooling

The text is an editorial commentary lacking specific names, dates, transactions, or actionable allegations. It mentions political figures in a generic way without new or verifiable claims, offering mi Critiques focus on test-based accountability in education. Mentions Bush, Clinton, and Obama as products of elite schooling. Questions relevance of easily testable subjects versus civic education.

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #023832
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The text is an editorial commentary lacking specific names, dates, transactions, or actionable allegations. It mentions political figures in a generic way without new or verifiable claims, offering mi Critiques focus on test-based accountability in education. Mentions Bush, Clinton, and Obama as products of elite schooling. Questions relevance of easily testable subjects versus civic education.

Tags

education-policypolitical-commentaryaccountabilityhouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
&6 Teaching Minds SOME SUBJECTS ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN OTHER SUBJECTS Yes, we have electives. But they don’t matter. Because accountability means making sure that we first teach what does matter. What mat- ters is the stuff that we are holding people accountable for. Since this seems to be math and science these days, for no good reason I can discern, this means that we will get to the stuff that would excite kids and keep them in school, and might teach them some job skills, after we are done with the important stuff. But I am certain that none of the politicians mentioned in the Times article knows the quadratic formula or the elements of the periodic table, which is, of course, the stuff of accountability since it is so easy to test. Then how can that be the important stuff? ALL IMPORTANT SUBJECTS CAN BE EASILY TESTED Yes, there are right answers in math. But are there right answers in whether we should have invaded Iraq? No? Does that mean we can’t teach how governments actually work and how to get reasoned argu- ments to be heard? Is there a right speech political candidates should make? Does that mean we can’t ask students to give speeches because we can’t easily assess them? Do we teach only subjects for which there are clear right answers? We do now, which is one reason why school is a deadly experience for one and all and will remain so as long as ac- countability is the key word in government. SEEING WHO DID BETTER THAN WHOM IN SCHOOL IS AN INTRINSIC PART OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS It really is all about competition, isn’t it? Bush, both Clintons, and Obama are all the winners of the school competition. They went to Ivy League schools, which seems to be the real issue for most parents. I taught at Ivy League schools and I was profoundly unimpressed with the test- taking, grade-grubbing students I found there. The goal of education is not to say who won, and it is not to tell Harvard whom to admit. The goal is provide real-world skills, some of which

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

SWIFT/BICSUBJECTS

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.