Skip to content
Case File
d-26199House OversightOther

NLRB Final Rule Requiring Employers to Post NLRA Employee Rights Notices

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #022277
Pages
177
Persons
1

Summary

The document details the National Labor Relations Board's rulemaking process for a notice‑posting requirement. It contains no specific allegations, financial transactions, or undisclosed relationships Rule mandates all NLRA‑covered employers to post a standardized notice of employee rights in the wor Failure to post may be treated as an unfair labor practice and could toll the 6‑month filing perio

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

regulatory-actionnlrapolicy-impactnotice-postingnlrblabor-lawunfair-labor-practicelegal-exposure-potential-unfaihouse-oversight
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NLRB argues employer's failure to post required notice constitutes unfair labor practice under NLRA Section 8(a)(1)

The passage discusses legal interpretations of notice‑posting requirements under the National Labor Relations Act. It does not identify specific high‑profile individuals, corporations, or financial tr NLRB asserts that failure to post required labor‑law notices can be deemed an unfair labor practice. Cites Supreme Court precedent allowing the Board flexibility in interpreting Section 8(a)(1). Refe

4p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Federal Register discussion of NLNL notice‑posting rule and its legal justification

The passage is a routine regulatory analysis of a labor‑law notice‑posting requirement. It contains no specific allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving high‑profile officials or entities Reference to Pilchak attorneys proposing changes to the notice rule. Citations of court cases (UAW v. Chao, Brown, etc.) supporting agency authority. Discussion of historical unionization rates and t

3p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NLRB proposes and finalizes rule requiring NLRA notice postings in workplaces

The passage details routine rulemaking by the National Labor Relations Board on posting employee rights notices. It contains no allegations of misconduct, financial flows, or involvement of high‑level Executive Order 13496 (2009) mandates posting NLRA rights for federal contractors. NLRB proposed and finalized a rule making notice posting an unfair labor practice if not complied wi The rule faced

4p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NLRB Notice Posting Rule Debate Shows Mixed Public Comments on Employee Awareness of NLRA Rights

The passage records public comments on a proposed NLRB rule requiring workplace posting of NLRA rights. It contains no concrete leads about wrongdoing, financial flows, or high‑level officials. The on Comments are split: some claim workers already know union rights, others say they are largely unawar Employers and industry groups argue the rule is unnecessary and costly. Union and worker advocates

3p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NLRB Defends Authority to Issue Notice‑Posting Rule Under NLRA

The passage outlines legal arguments about the National Labor Relations Board's rulemaking authority. It mentions no high‑profile individuals, financial transactions, or foreign influence, and the con Board cites Chevron and Supreme Court precedent to justify notice‑posting rule. Comments from industry groups (Texas Association for Home Care & Hospice, Independent Bakers Associa Member Hayes (NLRB

3p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Dissenting Opinion Challenges NLRB's Authority to Impose Workplace Notice‑Posting Rule

The passage is a legal dissent arguing that the National Labor Relations Board lacks statutory authority to require employers to post notices of employee rights. It contains no new allegations of misc Claims the NLRA does not grant the Board authority to mandate notice posting. Cites historical statutes (RLA, Title VII, FMLA, OSHA) that include explicit posting requirements. Contrasts the NLRB rul

3p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.