Appeal challenges dismissal of lawsuits against Saudi financial institutions alleged to have funded al‑Qaeda before 9/11
Summary
The filing identifies specific Saudi banks and charitable trusts (Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, Saleh Abdullah Kamel, Dallah al‑Baraka, Dar‑Al‑Maal Al‑Islami Trust) as alleged material supporter Plaintiffs allege five Saudi‑linked financial entities knowingly funded al‑Qaeda for over a decade b Claims are brought under multiple statutes: Anti‑Terrorism Act, Torture Victim Protection Act, RIC
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
MDL filings reveal Saudi banks and bin Laden family entities dismissed in 9/11 terrorism lawsuits
The document lists dozens of Saudi financial institutions and members of the bin Laden family as defendants in the September 11th multidistrict litigation, showing that plaintiffs alleged their suppor Seventy‑five defendants, including major Saudi banks and bin Laden family members, were part of a jo Plaintiffs seek to vacate dismissals of Al Rajhi Bank, SAMBA, DMI Trust, Saleh Abdullah Kamel, and
Plaintiffs allege Al Rajhi Bank knowingly funded al‑Qaida front charities and 9/11 hijacker Abdulaziz al‑Omari
The passage provides specific allegations linking a major Saudi bank to material support for al‑Qaida, including direct references to front charities, wire transfers, and a named 9/11 hijacker. While Al Rajhi Bank allegedly provided financial services to al‑Qaida front charities (IIRO, MWL, WAMY, BI Bank accounts were used to solicit and transfer funds to terrorist organizations, including al‑Qai
Saudi Princes Sultan and Turki sued for alleged tortious aid to al Qaeda via charitable donations
The passage outlines a civil suit alleging that Prince Sultan and Prince Turki of Saudi Arabia knowingly funded charities that supported al Qaeda, linking them directly to the 9/11 attacks. It provide Plaintiffs allege Prince Sultan and Prince Turki aided terrorism through donations to Islamic charit Claims assert the princes knew or should have known the charities supported al Qaeda. The suit inv
Saudi High Commission claims FSIA immunity in 9/11 terrorism funding lawsuit
The passage reveals that the Saudi High Commission (SHC), a Saudi government‑created aid agency, asserted sovereign immunity under the FSIA while being sued for allegedly funding terrorists linked to SHC was created by the Saudi Council of Ministers to provide aid to Bosnia and is staffed by Saudi c Plaintiffs allege two Saudi officials used their official positions to fund terrorist groups via I
Plaintiffs Seek ATA Liability Against Saudi Financial Institutions for 9/11 Support
The passage outlines a legal argument that Saudi‑linked banks and investment firms (Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, Dar Al‑Maal‑Al‑Islami Trust, Saleh Abdullah Kamel, Dallah al‑Baraka Group) may h ATA provides treble damages for victims of international terrorism. Plaintiffs allege material support to al‑Qaeda by specific Saudi banks and investors. District court dismissed claims for lack of k
Court dismissals of terrorism lawsuits against Saudi princes highlight alleged al‑Qaeda financing links
The passage details multiple civil actions alleging that Saudi princes Prince Sultan and Prince Turki provided material support to al‑Qaeda, and notes ongoing motions to dismiss on jurisdictional grou Multiple plaintiffs allege that Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz Al‑Saud and Prince Turki Al‑Faisal bin A Cases cited include Ashton v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army, Burnett v. Al Baraka Investment & Development
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.